Celtic Rumours Member Posts

• Login
• Register

Celtic Bhoy7's Profile

Celtic Bhoy7's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Celtic Bhoy7's Posts

To Celtic Bhoy7's last 5 rumours posts

Celtic Bhoy7's rumours posts with other poster's replies to Celtic Bhoy7's rumours posts

09 Jun 2013 11:51:40
Has any1 heard anything yet regarding any of our possible targets surely we ain't dragging our heels over 3/4 million for russell the wages we are freeing up and the champions league money surely there's got to be at least 15 million to spend Celtic Bhoy7

1.) Celtic won't spend £15m, even if Wanyama and Hooper are sold. I can't understand why no move is being made for Russell, he fits the signing pattern perfectly - young, loads of potential, resale value and cheap! I would love to think it is because they have someone better lined up but.

2.) A portugese paper is reporting balde is on his way for a medical

3.) I'm not caring about the balde guy, I'd rather have russell. I know his game, watch him most weeks when the utd games were on telly, I think he's a perfect fit for celtic. but as a celtic fan I am used to us dragin our heels when it comes to signin players, again we have already lost out on one of our top targets the young winger tonev, and also looks like we will lose out on russell. as for the balde deal we very nearly lost out because we low ball'd his current club. I'm all for a bargain, but if u want quality sometimes u need to pay a little bit extra.

4.) Russell being a good player indeed, but has anyone else think that maybe he isn't what NL wants? He is a good player but who's is he going to replace at Celtic? Hooper?poor replacement. Stokes?poor replacement. Watt? can't see him coming to CP to come of the bench now and again. the lad Griffiths would be a better option?

5.) Who is he going to replace? Any club needs 4 or 5 strikers. We could end up with 2 if/ when Hooper goes. Are you happy to go with Stokes and Watt for the whole season. We probably need Russell and Balde!

6.) Plenty of time left lads. The season has just ended. Still think russel will sign for us. He gets back from tenerife tonight
Hew1888

7.) Lassad, michu, mcourt, murphy and rogne are gone hopefully bangura that's got to free up over 40k a week I didn't mean spend 15million on tranfers I was including wages in that as well 7million on transfers and 8 on wages surely we can afford that 3/4 mil for proven scorer in spl worth a shout the bhoys young what if we get striker injured

8.) Am the same I'd rather have Russell am going to be gutted when he signes for Darby tomorrow it's terrible that we haven't even made a bid and for saying maybe Lennon doesn't want him he was the one that asked to be kept in the loop over the deal I just hope he makes a last ditch effort tomorrow.

9.) Why did we bid £500k previously then not bother now? What's changed? Ed? Stevo dundee {Ed007's Note - Better players' available now perhaps Stevo, better VFM and definitely more variety...}

10.) Ed do you think there's a slight chance we might still bid for Russell? {Ed007's Note - I hope not.}

11.) Am I the only one that would like Lassad to stay. I think given a couple of games he could be really good for us. There is a couple of times we have seen flashes of his ability. None more so than when he volleyed a Chris Commons cross into the bottom right corner past the keeper. That was an excellent touch and finish. The guy hasn't had a chance yet.

12.) Does it not occur to you that maybe NL does not rate him too highly? He is decent, nothing more. Not any better than Stokes

13.) Ed I take it you don't want Russell? Look at McDonald he was a class player for us. But even if you don't want him do you think we will bid? {Ed007's Note - For domestic football sure shouldn't we be looking at a higher level of player?}

14.) Ed why are you against Russell, I like many others would take him in a heartbeat. {Ed007's Note - {Ed007's Note - For domestic football sure shouldn't we be looking at a higher level of player? We are quick enough to shout about being a Champions League team, shouldn't we have they players to back it up?}

15.) Don't want Johnny Russell because he's not champions league quality? How many of our current squad were champions league quality when we bought them? Russell is 23, just because he may not be champions league quality now does not mean he won't be champions league quality in 2/3 years. That's how we roll, we don't buy the finished article, we buy players with the potential to become very good players and I believe Russell has that potential. Would much rather have Russell over Balde.

16.) Hi Ed I keep seeing that when Russell is mentioned you say we are going for a higher level of player Balde is not a higher level of player nor was Fontune when we could have had Fletcher nor Jimenez when we could have had McCarthy I know scottish players are not the flavour this month but we have always had a core of scots who were there for many years and at the moment Mulgrew, Brown, Commons and Forrest have been some of our most consistant players and hopefully will be for years to come john {Ed007's Note - Russell will do a job domestically and may move on to be able to play at a higher level, just because he Scottish doesn't mean we should take the risk. Let him go and enjoy a half decent career for himself rather than clog up outr bench. }

Celtic Bhoy7 has no Banter Posts

Celtic Bhoy7 has no Rumour Replies

Celtic Bhoy7 has no Banter Replies