Celtic Rumours Archive January 07 2019

 

Use our rumours form to send us celtic transfer rumours.

07 Jan 2019 23:00:16
Hibs want Morgan in loan.
Sorry but as much as I love Lennon that club should get nothing from us as long as that clown Rod Petrie is involved with them.

Believable4 Unbelievable0

08 Jan 2019 00:07:29
Kev83. I agree with you Petrie and Hibs got good loans and deals from us . No more.

Agree3 Disagree0

08 Jan 2019 08:02:38
Nonsense, end of the day all petrie was doing was getting maximum fee for mcginn. He would be an incompetent chairman if he didnt.

You would be complaining if Lawwell let any player go on the cheap so what's difference about what Petrie done?

Anyway Hibs have a fantastic track record of developing players and its a certainty we will sign good players from them in future. Why shoot self in foot over a tit for tat transfer fiasco that has long settled?

Agree6 Disagree0

08 Jan 2019 08:52:41
I personally think Rodgers is off at the end of the season.
If we are only signing loan players for six months, think that tells it’s own story.
We should be looking at rebuilding for next season, Benkovic will be away boyata will go and the other 2 loan signings will be off.
We really need a permanent centre half in just now and a right back and possibly a replacement for brown, plus a striker.
This window will tell us everything we need to know about our boards ambition, come on celtic it’s time to deliver the players we need.

Agree0 Disagree1

08 Jan 2019 09:13:46
What a load of rubbish Phil.
He gave Celtic the run around and change the asking price twice.
He then quoted us 4 million and then sold for under 3 million.
We had help his club with several players that other wise they wouldn't have been able to afford at the time.
Stokes and henderson were the major reason they won the Scottish cup
Efe and Allan both loaned to them.
Not one player should go to them from us unless a fee is paid or their contract up. No more loans.

Agree1 Disagree0

08 Jan 2019 11:05:29
Rob Petrie was looking after Hibs people can spin it anyway they want . McGinn would have been a Celtic player for us if he wanted to he didn't.

Agree3 Disagree0

08 Jan 2019 11:25:28
Happy if he was just looking after hibs why did he quote 4 million to us and sell for under 3?

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Jan 2019 11:39:21
Nonsense Kev? i don't blame Petrie for giving run around. Lawwell has a track record of doing it to other clubs, so why shouldn't Petrie return the same? Done the same to The rangers regarding Scott Allan yet Hibs were praised for their hardline stance so what's different now?

I get the impression you think because we are celtic every other scottish team should bow down and let Lawwell take the pi$$ when negotiating transfers.

Aye good one! Stop all loans to hibs halt development of our prospects for future at a team renown for its development success.

Agree3 Disagree0

08 Jan 2019 11:58:23
No what they did to rangers was refuse to sell to a team they were in a promotional battle with.
No I have no problem buying players at a fair price from Scottish football but what I have got a problem with is a team quoting us 1.25 million more than they want from another team.
Basically saying you pay extra because your Celtic.

How have hibs helped develop ANY Celtic player.
Not one we have loaned them have returned to help our team.

Efe gone
Henderson gone
Stokes gone
None of them played for us agin
Allen never kicked a ball for us since his loan.

Send our players to the likes of killie or the dons who both have helped our players develop in to first team player.

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Jan 2019 12:07:38
Kev what's your source on this? The only time I've heard about the price being changed was from Celtic fans on Twitter after he signed for Villa. I know a close family member of McGinn's and Celtic did plenty of their own messing about.

Agree1 Disagree0

08 Jan 2019 13:03:53
More so to do with the fact he's on the board of the spl/ sfa and part of the sweep sweep operation of the hun corruption and choosing to do nothing about it. Should get no favours from us.

Agree1 Disagree0

08 Jan 2019 13:08:30
I know someone that has a lot to do with hibs. He has a big business in the capital and puts a fair bit of cash in. He's also hibs mad and hate the bold Ron.
Your right Kev Celtic did mess around as well but Pertie definitely was wanting to put the boot in. He hates lawwel.

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Jan 2019 13:24:33
Fair enough Kev. The way I look at it though is where is our player likely to get the best development? If the the answer is undisputedly Hibs then I can't see our club letting pettiness get in the way of a player's development. I'd say Sunderland would be a good move for him though.

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Jan 2019 13:59:34
I've said it before killie under Clarke is where id loan our player to in the 1st instance then the dons.
They help develop both ajer and Christie into 1st team players.
Though I think it was elbows who was in charge at killie at time.

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Jan 2019 13:59:40
Braveheart 86

Our own plc are as guilty of this than anyone.

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Jan 2019 16:14:50
Kev, Petrie held out for best price which is what they got Celtic wouldn’t reach the price wanted and tried to hold out, so when a higher offer of £3,5m with add ons which in total will be nearly £4 m then we had to take higher offer it’s business mate anyway I hope your lot win the league and keep the people in there place.

Agree2 Disagree0

08 Jan 2019 18:24:44
Hibsboy Celtic matched that offer. And the add ons are not guaranteed
Some of them have to do with promotion to the EPL, which is highly unlikely with that basket case of a club.

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Jan 2019 21:43:06
Personally i think McGinn signed for Steve Bruce not Aston Villa. Never heard a bad word said about Steve Bruce and if stories are true he is meant to be a gentleman.

Whatever happened during negotiation process we will never know. One thing that possibly could of happened was McGinn being told he is not being sold to celtic and if he really wants to go, it has to be another club.

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Jan 2019 19:59:59
Weah confirmed but only till the end of the season.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

07 Jan 2019 20:16:17
Hate loan signings especially this short but if it wins us the league fair enough.

Agree1 Disagree0

07 Jan 2019 20:25:32
A lot of rumours there will be an option for another year if it all goes well.

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Jan 2019 20:21:10
If it’s only to the end of the season I’m really not overly pleased, an 18 month deal would have been a lot better. It seems like we want to improve the forward areas but don’t want to pay to do it. We signed two players now who we lose and will probably have to replace in the summer, and get it sorted hopefully before the champions league qualifiers . It all seems a bit short sighted . Hopefully we may be using the bulk of the budget on defenders as we have the same problem there in the summer.

Agree2 Disagree0

07 Jan 2019 20:58:07
It isn't ideal but if the rumors are true on this lads potential ability I'd rather have than have not.

Get in bayo and Rodgers has 2 players for every forward position n that should turn those rubbish away draws to wins.

Im coming round to BRs thinking, young hungry players for the run in.

Agree1 Disagree0

07 Jan 2019 21:13:48
We have Arzani due back also only so may wingers/ forwards you can have?

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Jan 2019 22:30:31
Just a Twitter rumour, maybe just that, Daniel Sturridge to Celtic, loan or permanent unknown, allegedly from a footballers agent.

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Jan 2019 23:18:17
No chance Sturridge will come up hear I would eat my hat if that deal would happen.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed0333's Note - I’m not sure you want Sturridge mate. Be careful what you wish for.

08 Jan 2019 07:26:05
Sturridge? Did you watch him last night for someone who should’ve been busting a gut considering the competition he has was as disinterested a player I’ve ever seen.
As for Weah as much as I don’t like loans 6 month with (if there is one) 18 month extension probably makes sense considering the musonda fiasco.

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Jan 2019 08:39:42
Im not concerned that the deals are only six months, and if the rumours of a chance to extend are true then that is all the better. if you look at the Mosunda loan, we took him for 18 months and it didn't work, we could have been stuck with him. 6 months will see if he can adapt to the scottish game and then look at extending.

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Jan 2019 11:55:59
Does anyone know if young Arzani is still with the club.
I wasn't sure if Man City recalled him after the injury and the deal was cancelled.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

07 Jan 2019 17:17:51
As far as I know he's back at city for treatment but will return when he's fit.

Agree1 Disagree0

07 Jan 2019 17:56:20
Cheers Steph.

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Jan 2019 22:05:02
Arzani will be a while yet, was it not a full knee recon?

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Jan 2019 07:26:41
A think he's out till may. Can see his loan being extended, is there an option to buy do u know.

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Jan 2019 00:17:13
The daily Record reporting we have nothing to do with Ellis.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

07 Jan 2019 15:58:08
The daily rangers also stated that rangers died and the new club is the old club? Go figure.

Agree6 Disagree0

 
Change Consent