Celtic Rumours Archive December 18 2020

 

Use our rumours form to send us celtic transfer rumours.

18 Dec 2020 19:13:22
Ed I see today we already have britexit complications today with foreign player transfers. Is this a permanent issue going forward?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - The issues will surround younger players - no 16 or 17 year old transfers any longer and no more than three 18-21 year olds signing per window. Then those over 21 will need work permits. I doubt it will be a major issue for most clubs.}

18 Dec 2020 19:48:48
Excellent thanks for simplifying it, seems complicated how it was reported today.
Merry Christmas to you and family by the way.
I’ll also contribute to the charity if I’m not too late.

Agree0 Disagree0

18 Dec 2020 21:59:19
Thanks Ed002 appreciate that. The charity I was referring to is Ed007 ;)

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Dec 2020 07:15:51
Ed would this be the same the other way around, like our youngsters couldn't move abroad? So we won't lose youngsters.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - No, but clubs will be relutant to let players go.}

18 Dec 2020 08:51:29
I read a lot of Celtic news and what I'm hearing is we have a chance with Foster again. For I would love him to come back but he promised Lennon he would and changed his mind. I think he has his chance to come back and make history for a club and fans who adured him through out his career. You let us done Foster so stay were you are. Hope we have our new wall in Hazard.

Believable1 Unbelievable0

18 Dec 2020 13:39:46
Story I was told is the deal was all good to go and Lawell trued to make it a loan at the last minute. Southampton and Forster didn't want that.

Agree0 Disagree0

18 Dec 2020 15:59:42
Forster comes back he get #28529439.

Really despised the fact that he claimed the 67.

Agree0 Disagree0

18 Dec 2020 16:10:32
Did you despise when wanyama claimed it?

Agree1 Disagree0

18 Dec 2020 16:29:39
Wanyama wasn't a loanee. But fair point, Dc7591. I really should invest in a numerical keyboard.

Agree1 Disagree0

18 Dec 2020 20:53:26
I'm not getting this fascination with Foster?
Do you really think he'd have made that much of a difference, as I think we had far bigger problems than goal keeper.
The midfield has been stagnant for months winning little 50/ 50s thus inviting pressure on our defence. Lennon finally changes it (probably due to fan pressure) and just like magic our performances improve and we win.
To me the keeper hasn't been the problem although Barkas has been poor, it's been the team selection. It's too early to write off Barkas I think.

Agree1 Disagree0

18 Dec 2020 21:08:43
I should have finished my last post with - and Hazard hasn't done anything wrong so far so deserves his chance in the team.

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Dec 2020 02:48:09
Still a wee bit early to write of Barkas for me too. From what I've seen in a Celtic jersey, Forster is better than anything we have, or have had, since he was here first time around. Barkas clearly hasn't settled, he seems shot of confidence to me and not vocal enough (that may never change) . Bigger problems than a goalkeeper yes, namely creativity for me, but there's only XI men on the pitch and a better keeper would have made a difference. They can improve your entire defence.

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Dec 2020 10:02:25
Jim, Hazard deserves his chance and is more vocal than the other two keepers. I hope the lad goes on to grab his chance as out No 1.
Not sure even player the 3 keepers at the same time would've helped the defence the way Lennon had them set up.

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Dec 2020 10:19:30
Forster was used to paper over the cracks in what was a very underperforming team, most of the time, forget about Forster and get the rest of the team playing to a much higher standard.

Agree1 Disagree0

 
Change Consent