09 Oct 2015 12:54:54
I see we are being linked to Souttar again. I would be happy with that and get shot of Mulgrew as he's versatile too
10 Oct 2015 01:56:14
so u are saying he is better than mulgrew? Utter pish.
10 Oct 2015 13:21:36
Surely there's not many worse than oor charlie
10 Oct 2015 16:35:59
Nt87 what a load of pish! Not many worse than our Charlie! I can think of 2 in our defence alone! Ambrose and boyata! And this again being linked with yet another Utd player is an example of us going back the way! We've went from not looking at any Scottish players to wanting to buy the entire Dundee Utd squad!! But as far as young Soutar being better than big mulgrew! Utter garbage!
11 Oct 2015 08:51:53
Thanks for your insight there Dh88; I think Souttar probably is better than Mulgrew
11 Oct 2015 11:26:12
Just my opinion mate! Forgive me for saying but is Soutar not playing for the team that's rock bottom of the SPL? How many times have u seen the boy live? Yes u mite not rate mulgrew,but to say a young boy who plays for the bottom team in the SPL is better than big Charlie baffles me!
11 Oct 2015 12:21:22
Considering he's 10 years younger than Charlie, and Charlie adds nothing to put team. I'd rather we released mulgrew and signed souttar. I've only seen him live a couple of times. Sometimes I wish I'd never seen mulgrew play live. I don't really care if his team are bottom of the third division, he's a decent player, and I think chuck is a poor player. In an ideal world I'd have neither.
12 Oct 2015 18:18:20
Because he is playing for a team that are struggling doesn't mean he isn't a good player.
What a weird way to assess a players ability.
13 Oct 2015 20:08:52
Magic pole what's weird about making the assessment that the boy plays in a team that's currently rooted to the bottom of the SPL!! Hardly instills confidence in the boys ability!! What's weird is saying a boy who's done nothing in the game is better than a player who's played in title winning teams CL football and has won Scotlands player of the year!