Celtic Rumours Archive May 26 2012

 

Use our rumours form to send us celtic transfer rumours.

26 May 2012 22:17:42
Is there any chance of getting our rumour page back for god sake!?? Can we get back to discussing our own god damn club and not what goes on at Ibrox?!

Jesus Christ I am sick of discussing it. I know what they have done and I understand it back to front. I hope they suffer for many a year but let's stop revelling in it like they would. Let's discuss our own great, law abiding club and forget their plight for 5 or 6 years.

Believable18 Unbelievable10

Well said!

BarryBhoy

Agree0 Disagree0

Totally agree with this post!

Agree0 Disagree0

I can see where you are coming from, but without us discussing it they would have swept it all under the carpet. Some size of carpet mind.

Agree0 Disagree0

I must admit I was guilty of the odd non Celtic comment. But have to agree with you barrybhoy, time to get back to all things Celtic. Lets enjoy being champions & get our rumour page back & enjoy the wit & humour, intelligence & class of our fellow bhoys n ghirls

JollyGreenGiant

Agree0 Disagree0

This is probably the biggest scandal in the history of Scottish Football so am happy to have it all played out on here when it is to the detriment of the Huns and we now have a Close Season period to see through.

If you dont like it then dont come on here?

Iain

Agree0 Disagree0

I tried to put this point up a couple of weeks ago but it never got put up. Totally agree so board of rangers now.

Agree0 Disagree0

I agree its a total PITY however many questions had to be addressed and moreover many questions had to be formulated. A great job has been done by all in this regard and I for one am thankful as it has clarified many of the points and issues. I am sure it helped to inform many people long before the official and late recognition of the facts as they emerged from the official channels. Well done to everyone particularly Ed 07 for being ahead of the game and carrying out what was effectively a public duty which many others failed to do! Time now for a wee break but as new revelations emerge I fully expect them to be posted here and quite rightly. Sopot Celt {Ed007's Note - Thanks mate. I can only answer or comment on what is sent in to us.}

Agree0 Disagree0

Iain this is a Celtic rumours page! Not a discussing rangers tax, fraud ect.... Page! Agree with the rest lets get back to the Celtic Rumours. The clue is in the name. P.s great site ed {Ed007's Note - Thanks.}

Agree0 Disagree0

If you don't like it don't read it.

However, it's the biggest ever story in Scottish football and I for one find it totally fascinating and would want to post comments in relation to it as well as about Celtic.

We can have both.

K-Dot.

Agree0 Disagree0

About time someone said something about this. well done mate.

Agree0 Disagree0

What a well thought out repost "if u don't like it, don't come on here". The point is that we have now discussed it, we have ensured it played out and some excellent journalism by the CQN boys has put the Rangers case front and centre.

It is now time, which was my point, to move aside and let it get dealt with. I want to know who we are linked with b4 CL time, who's leaving etc. it's a rumour page.

Ed - a suggestion may be to have a Rangers Tax Case section. Then, as our highly intelligent friend suggests, I wouldn't go there. {Ed007's Note - I could probably get the geek squad to set that up if people want.}

Agree0 Disagree0

Indeed K-Dot we can have both, I was never advocating not having Celtic rumours.

This was some of our other more intelligent posters could as they say choose not to go there

Iain

Agree0 Disagree0

26 May 2012 20:42:25
"Football is nothing without fans", a quote from the great man himself, the night big Jock passed away, was the only time in my life that I ever saw my dad shed a tear.

Rest in peace big man, you put our great club on the map, and for that I will be forever in your debt.

Believable20 Unbelievable5

Big jock got a cbe , while murray git a knighthood, joke

Agree0 Disagree0

We all know who the jokes on now though and makes a mockery of the whole 'knighthood' thingy. Mrs E

Agree0 Disagree0

26 May 2012 18:00:18
Ed do you know if Celtic have signed the boy from Ajaccio,Quentin Boesso.MACCA {Ed007's Note - Not according to his club.}

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Cheers ed.MACCA {Ed007's Note - No probs Macca.}

Agree0 Disagree0

Ed who is this boy mate?
Conor67 {Ed007's Note - All I know is the information available to everyone. He is a 26 years old AM. He is from Reunion (maybe Agathe has tipped CFC off??) and is playing in the third tier of French football. He scored 8 goals in 28 matches last season. That is it mate, sorry. Nobody I know has ever heard of him let alone see him play.}

Agree0 Disagree0

Cheers bud
Conor67 {Ed007's Note - :-)

Agree0 Disagree0

I'm sure i read in The View that Agathe was bringing over a few boys from his academy this summer,maybe he might be one of them.

Jungle Bhoy. {Ed007's Note - He's 26 JB or I would have thought that as well.}

Agree0 Disagree0

Thought you might have meant to put 16 not 26.

JB {Ed007's Note - No mate, that is why it seems so strange. In saying that though, who had heard of Lubo before we signed him?}

Agree0 Disagree0

26 May 2012 17:37:23
Hi Ed, just watching the play-offs and wondering if the Rhodes price will be effected should huddersfield go up? {Ed007's Note - I would doubt it. Huddersfield have already let people know the sort of fee they will be looking for. He is still unproven at any higher level.}

Believable4 Unbelievable1

Hudds have told interested clubs the minimum fee will be 8m. everton and aston villa are interested. {Ed007's Note - Aston Villa don't even have a manager or anyone running the footballing side of things. Everton can't afford to buy Hooper, they can afford £8 million for anyone. Everton are in talks with Bjorn Bergmann Siguroason as well.}

Agree0 Disagree0

£8M? That good and never scored today against a medicore english side.
Hooper has scored against the best sides he's been put up against inc Europe.
HOOPER NOT FOR SALE THIS SEASON. Ed, he's under contract or 2 years {Ed007's Note - A contract that pays him £12K a week, you should try telling his agent he isn't for sale.}

Agree0 Disagree0

26 May 2012 17:16:54
Hi bhoys ghirls and of course Ed.

just heard that rtc has a story that will make everything that has happened to the SHAME so far seem like nothing so loads more to come ghuys .

ed have you heard anything about this.

hail hail

Marco1888 {Ed007's Note - I'm sure there is more to come out of it all Marco.}

Believable3 Unbelievable2

Is it the rumours about the phone tappin on a bigger scale than fergus? if its true there will be no saving them

Agree0 Disagree0

I heard that rumour ...but what I heard was it was to do with hbos so this is supposed to be nuclear and blows everything that's happened out of the water.

hail hail

Marco1888

Agree0 Disagree0

Here's hoping it finishes the scabby unwashed for good and has people up on charges....and the SFA too, hope it is the end of them....!!!

Bring it on!!

Iain

Agree0 Disagree0

The author of the RTC blog has stated that there is further information to come out.

K-Dot.

Agree0 Disagree0

26 May 2012 17:15:56
i urge all Celtic fans and fans of football and the sporting integrity of football, to email UEFA and complain about Rangers taking the SFA to court, which is against UEFA and FIFA rules, as from where i stand UEFA are not aware of this, or of the evidence against Rangers of 3rd party contracts in breech of regulations as well. the SFA are incompetent and have shown favoritism to Rangers by not expelling them the sanction they should have used in the first place.
i for one have already sent an email to UEFA and one to FIFA with links to the BBC programme etc, but for this to be heard, i hope 1000s of football fans who believe in fairness and sporting integrity to do the same {Ed007's Note - UEFA are well aware of the situation. I wouldn't advise anyone to e-mail them etc. It would serve no purpose and make CFC fans look petty.}

Believable4 Unbelievable2

I agree with Ed.Just let it be as UEFA will know exactly what is going on and the SFA will hopefully act and punish Gers.If they don't then UEFA will come down on them and they will lose the junkets to other countries.Plenty of time to send emails etc if Gers get let off but just now,sit back,have a beer and watch the daily chaos coming out of Ibrox.

Jungle Bhoy.

Agree0 Disagree0

No i disagree we have been just accepting it for to long , this must not be allowed to be swept under the carpet as they have shown in the past the sfa/spl will be bullied into doing nothing by the shame fans and the scottish media if we just leave them to get on with it , we have been cheated and we MUST complain to uefa and fifa , fab1 {Ed007's Note - How is anything being swept under the carpet? Everyone is jumping to conclusions that this will be a cover up, UEFA are a lot bigger than the SFA or Rangers ever will be, they are their bosses, it's their way or the highway. Nobody can explain why the SFA would basically put themselves out of a job, let THEIR team (Scotland) be banned from competing, and over see the demise of Scottish football just to do Rangers a favour. If the SFA don't enforce the sanctions then UEFA will get involved and deal with it. The SFA can't and I seriously doubt they would, go up against their bosses (UEFA), there really would be no point. The SFA need UEFA a damn sight more than they need Rangers. It's the basic statutes of the whole game, no other FA has backed down, and against a lot more powerful teams than Rangers (Juventus??), so why would the SFA? I think people are reading far too much into daft conspiracy theories here, let's just deal with facts.}

Agree0 Disagree0

Sorry Ed. hit send button on last post too soon by mistake. Can you edit after http..Ta
P.O.B. {Ed007's Note - I never got anything from you POB???}

Agree0 Disagree0

Okay Ed ta.
I was only posting that RFC /D&P can approach UEFA for special dispensation,citing "Extraordinary circumstances" regarding possibility of losing the high earners,and transfer embargo stopping them from replacing them. This is the "Predjudicial to the petitioners" part,and unfair to the new owners. However they would have had to approach UEFA first,who would then decide whether it was worthy of being sent to CAS. I would hope(lol) and assume that the eminent legal team have contacted UEFA,and received a reply giving the go ahead prior to taking SFA to court? Otherwise i don't know why they've bothered. But then Whyte etc have outmanouvered smarter men than me lately.
P.O.B. {Ed007's Note - UEFA would point out that taking the SFA to court was contravening the games statutes, they couldn't recommend one of it's member clubs to break it's own rules.}

Agree0 Disagree0

Hi Ed 007,

I am as concerned about the situation as any fair minded (Celtic Minded) person.

I agree with the Ed please do not deminish our reputation, let the cards fall where they will.

Fair play has to be the winner in this situation.

Lost Bhoy 50 {Ed007's Note - Hi buddy.}

Agree0 Disagree0

Well that what the articles and the statutes dictate. That's what i can't get my head round,why have they done it?
Either Whyte/D&P/SEVCO etc were all working together to a master plan,and something has gone drastically wrong, to force this drastic action, or they were just out to finish Rangers from the offset.
P.O.B. {Ed007's Note - It is a very strange turn of events POB, I really can't understand why Rangers would go down this road.}

Agree0 Disagree0

Spot on ed we all have to count to 10.

Agree0 Disagree0

Why keep harping on about sporting integrity when you would jump ship to England at the first oppertunity.

Agree0 Disagree0

26 May 2012 16:31:25
ED007, I know all on here can rely on
you for factual information...
In pub lunchtime, in company of group of bears, not pals, they knew my
allegiances and came up with this cracker Rangers are going to court, because they know they are up the creek without a paddle, anyway these bears said rumours going around their sites and also within Ibrokes, is that "let's take Celtic and SFA down with us", they know UEFA will throw book at them but want SFA fined and Celtic BANNED from
europe, thinking being lets take money off Celtic...I just laughed at them, but thinking about it can Rangers actions have an impact on Celtic's Champions League place? Timalloy {Ed007's Note - It can't affect any other club or the national team as long as the SFA stick by their punishment. UEFA threatened the Swiss FA with sanctions if they did not punish Sion, Basel could have been kicked out the CL, the Swiss FA deducted Sion 36 points (the games that ineligible players had played in) and that was the end of it. It's another straw for them to clutch onto Tim, the SFA will do what UEFA want (tell??) them to do, it's that simple. As I said Rangers might (not) live to regret going down this road. The actual stupid part is that they don't realise they have had their 'favour', the SFA openly said they could have expelled Rangers, they should accept the punishment and get on with it before they dig an even deeper hole. Do you think that the SFA will not obey UEFA just to please Rangers and their fans?}

Believable5 Unbelievable1

Hey ed, i sent in asking what the chances are that Celtic and others could move to another league because of what is said above that i think they are trying to take Celtics name and brand down. i know you are prob tiered of talking about it but if UEFA see sfa/spl are doing nothing as it looks like they are going easy on them then they have to say scottish clubs cant compete in CL, so given that senerioa has there been or would there be a good chance that they would allow clubs to move? i know the rules and all but would this not be a special case with Celtics name and history and all. {Ed007's Note - I actually don't see where everyone is getting this idea that the SFA will not enforce any punishment. Without a major rule change, no team from Scotland will be joining any other league.}

Agree0 Disagree0

European league is probably our best shot at moving leagues IMO.

Jungle Bhoy.

Agree0 Disagree0

Do you really think the administrators give a damn about Celtic let alone rangers what good would bringing you lot down do unless they have been told there's cash waiting

Agree0 Disagree0

No they are taking them to court because d+p are useless t**ts and think it sounds good to fans , what they dont realise is majority of fans accept sanctions and want to get on with it. As i said though majority there is still minority who think we should blame anybody else.
craig+babybear

Agree0 Disagree0

UEFA have not told the SFA to impose these sanctions and have stated that it is a matter for the SFA and they will not get involved. Why would UEFA tell the SFA to impose sanctions which they themselves accept as not being legally enforceable? {Ed007's Note - UEFA have never said the sanctions are not legally enforceable. They have said that it is against their statutes to take legal action against a member association.}

Agree0 Disagree0

Ed- My source has informed me that Uefa has in fact said this and there actions speak for themselves-
"Uefa has shelved proposals to impose a transfer ban on clubs that breach its financial fair-play rules amid concerns that its planned penalties will be legally unenforceable, or face challenges from individual players".
Also i'm afraid they have also said this
"The European governing body confirmed on Tuesday 22/11/11 that transfer embargo proposals, which had the support of leading clubs including Inter Milan and Arsenal, have been dropped because they were unenforceable. Control over player registrations lies with national associations and Fifa, not Uefa".
As far as I am aware it is in fact FIFA and not UEFA who oppose legal actions against member associations and will take action against the Association inc National team etc.
"Lawyers have advised that Uefa could be open to restraint-of-trade suits from players excluded from the competition". {Ed007's Note - What the hell has Rangers case got to do with the FFP rules? Absolutely nothing. As for opposing legal actions I would suggest you do a bit more research. If you don't know by now that it taking legal action against a member association to court breaks UEFA AND FIFA statutes I can only assume you work for D&P.}

Agree0 Disagree0

All I am saying Ed, is that UEFA had planned to impose transfer ban's as a punishment and were advised against it, so much so, that they binned the idea. I actually wonder if this was a ploy by the SFA to impose a sanction which could be reversed instead of using the correct sanction which would have ment expulsion.
I feel that I do have to defend myself some what by pointing out that RFC (IA) are being delt with under FFP rules as stated by UEFA:-
Uefa said it has "been in close contact throughout with the Scottish FA and the administrators of Rangers FC, in order to explain the club licensing and financial fair play rules and how they would apply in different possible scenarios".

"Such a situation falls under the authority of the national governing bodies responsible for evaluating and deciding on any necessary measure(s) they estimate appropriate to avoid similar cases occurring in the future.

"Uefa is entirely confident that the Scottish FA will deal with this case in full compliance with the national club licensing regulations and in the spirit of Uefa's club licensing and financial fair play regulations."


It would appear that ban's on transfers are legally contensious as stated by UEFA.
Both UEFA and FIFA state that disputes should be settled by avoiding ordinary courts instead using CAS. These seem to point towards instances were members or member clubs, leagues etc are in dispute with UEFA / FIFA. There are instances which CAS is not competent to deal with! (see artcle 63 UEFA statutes) The fact that UEFA have stated already that they are willing to let this be delt with by the SFA thus washing there hands of the situation, does not inspire me at all. FIFA however, administrate player registrations and may now want to step in although they don't seem to be in much of a hurry to intervene.
The worrying aspect of all this as far as i'm concerned is that associations tend to be punished where there is a breach (Article 9 UEFA statutes).
I can categorically deny working for D&P and think this is a bit of a cheap shot tbh. Never assume, for it makes
an ASS out of U and ME :-)

I just hope that this sorry situation does not end up with us suffering due to the actions of others. {Ed001's Note - sorry but you are talking about a completely different thing. You are referring to UEFA deciding that they could not enforce the FFP rules with transfer bans. It is a complete irrelevance to this situation and is not even close to the situation at hand. I have no idea what you are thinking, but you are completely on the wrong track, as the transfer bans are usable in a case where clubs have not paid their dues. Totally different from a case when a club is not making a profit, which is what the FFP ruling is regarding.}

Agree0 Disagree0

26 May 2012 15:56:34
sorry this is a bit long but action has to be taken on monday. it should have been taken already.

XII. RECOGNITION OF THE UEFA STATUTES, DISPUTES
1. Recognition of the UEFA Statutes
Recognition of the UEFA Statutes
Article 59
1 Each Member Association shall include in its statutes a
provision whereby it, its leagues, clubs, players and officials agree
to respect at all times the Statutes, regulations and decisions of
UEFA, and to recognise the jurisdiction of the Court of Arbitration
for Sport (CAS) in Lausanne (Switzerland), as provided in the
present Statutes.
2 Each Member Association shall ensure that its leagues, clubs,
players and officials acknowledge and accept these obligations.
3 Each participant in a UEFA competition shall, when registering
its entry, confirm to UEFA in writing that it, its players and officials
have acknowledged and accepted these obligations.
2. Disputes of National Dimension
Obligation to Refer Disputes to Court of Arbitration
Article 60
Associations shall include in their statutes a provision under
which disputes of national dimension arising from or related to
the application of their statutes or regulations shall, subject to
their national legislation, be referred in the last instance to an
independent and impartial court of arbitration, to the exclusion of
any ordinary court.
3. Disputes of European Dimension
CAS as Ordinary Court of Arbitration
Article 61
1 The CAS shall have exclusive jurisdiction, to the exclusion of
any ordinary court or any other court of arbitration, to deal with the
following disputes in its capacity as an ordinary court of arbitration:
a) disputes between UEFA and associations, leagues, clubs,
players or officials;
24
Disciplinary
Inspector
Associations’
Statutes
Associations’
Obligation
Participation
in a UEFA
Competition
Obligation to
Refer Disputes
to Court of
Arbitration
Jurisdiction
25
Conditions of
Intervention
Jurisdiction
Right to
Appeal
Time Limit for
Appeal
Internal
Procedures
Suspensory
Effect
Scope of
Review
Excluded
Jurisdiction
European
Members
Procedure
b) disputes of European dimension between associations,
leagues, clubs, players or officials.
2 The CAS shall only intervene in its capacity as an ordinary court
of arbitration if the dispute does not fall within the competence of a
UEFA organ.
CAS as Appeals Arbitration Body
Article 62
1 Any decision taken by a UEFA organ may be disputed
exclusively before the CAS in its capacity as an appeals
arbitration body, to the exclusion of any ordinary court or any
other court of arbitration.
2 Only parties directly affected by a decision may appeal to the
CAS. However, where doping-related decisions are concerned,
the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) may appeal to the CAS.
3 The time limit for appeal to the CAS shall be ten days from the
receipt of the decision in question.
4 An appeal before the CAS may only be brought after UEFA’s
internal procedures and remedies have been exhausted.
5 An appeal shall not have any suspensory effect as a stay of
execution of a disciplinary sanction, subject to the power of the
CAS to order that any disciplinary sanction be stayed pending
the arbitration.
6 The CAS shall not take into account facts or evidence which the
appellant could have submitted to an internal UEFA body by
acting with the diligence required under the circumstances, but
failed or chose not to do so.
Common Provisions
Article 63
1 The CAS is not competent to deal with:
a) matters related to the application of a purely sporting rule,
such as the Laws of the Game or the technical modalities of a
competition;
b) decisions through which a natural person is suspended for a
period of up to two matches or up to one month;
c) awards issued by an independent and impartial court of
arbitration in a dispute of national dimension arising from the
application of the statutes or regulations of an association.
2 Only arbitrators who have their domicile in Europe shall be
competent to deal with disputes submitted to the CAS according
to the present Statutes.
3 Moreover, proceedings before the CAS shall take place in
accordance with the Code of Sports-related Arbitration of the
CAS.
26
XIII. CONCLUDING PROVISIONS
Governing Law and Legal Forum
Article 64
1 These Statutes shall be governed in all respects by Swiss
law.
2 The legal forum shall be the headquarters of UEFA. Lausanne
(Switzerland) shall be the legal forum for all cases which, in
accordance with these Statutes, come under the jurisdiction of
CAS.
Matters not Covered in the Statutes
Article 65
The Executive Committee shall have the power to decide on all
matters not covered in these Statutes, such decisions to be made
in accordance with relevant FIFA regulations. If no such regulations
exist, the Executive Committee shall decide according to
right and justice.
Dissolution of UEFA
Article 66
1 A four-fifths majority of all Member Associations shall be
required to dissolve UEFA.
2 A four-fifths majority of all Member Associations shall be
required for any decision as to the distribution of the assets
of UEFA on dissolution. Without a decision as to such distribution,
any resolution to dissolve UEFA shall have no effect.
3 The assets of UEFA shall not under any circumstances be
divided among the members and any resolution to this effect
shall have no effect.
Equal Status of Men and Women
Article 67
In these Statutes, the use of the masculine form shall be interpreted
also to refer to the feminine.
Authoritative Version
Article 68
In the event of any discrepancy in interpretation between the
official languages of UEFA in the wording of these Statutes, the
English version shall be authoritative.
Swiss Law
Legal Forum
Executive
Committee
4/5 Majority
Assets
Division of
Assets
Equal Status
Authoritative
Version

Believable0 Unbelievable3

Far too damn hot to read this lot lol

Agree0 Disagree0

26 May 2012 14:51:30
Hi ed, obviously I would love hooper to stay but if he had to go then we could sell him for about 6-7m and buy Rhodes for 4m and maybe a solid cb for 3m.Sounds like good business to me what do u think?
Conor67 {Ed007's Note - I would settle for that Conor.}

Believable4 Unbelievable1

Rhodes is going for 8million. And hooper isnt going anywhere. {Ed007's Note - Rhodes is not going for £8 million, absolutely no chance.}

Agree0 Disagree0

Rhodes still not sure defo wouldnt spend 4 mill on a guy from the lower leagues.might be proved wrong but got a hunch he aint the real deal.

Agree0 Disagree0

26 May 2012 14:43:46
hi ed and guys, another question. i still don't see how they can get cva . but BIG IF they do i take it that the cva will only cover what they owe already . . so IF they do get it and then lose the big tax case will they go back into admin again ??bb {Ed007's Note - Yes mate, that would happen.}

Believable3 Unbelievable2

So this farce would start all over again ,and the last 4 months will have been for bugger all . bb {Ed007's Note - Until the result of the FTT is known I honestly can't see a way for Rangers to exit administration, it is the Sword of Damocles hanging over them. If Rangers lose this FTT then HMRC are entitled to their money immediately, even if Rangers appeal the case further.}

Agree0 Disagree0

26 May 2012 13:08:07
Does anyone know if celtic are actually playing real madrid in a friendly the herald says celtic announced it but it's not on the celtic website

Believable0 Unbelievable4

Bit confused myself.DR yesterday said they were but i understand the problems that Ed mentioned yesterday.

Jungle Bhoy.

Agree0 Disagree0

It was confirmed in the sun 4 aug 11 2nd game of the season bt we can cancel league game 4 the friendly its in the new rules from lst season we done it lst season for the dublin cup if u remember BRING ON RONALDO {Ed007's Note - {Ed007's Note - The SPL starts on the 4/5th of August, we have a CL 3rd round qualifier 2nd leg match on the 7/8th of August, Scotland play Australia at Hampden on the 15th August (there is a full international midweek friendly card). Until the club confirm this I can't see it happening, the site that was selling the tickets has also removed the fixture and I have not heard of anyone that actually managed to buy any tickets. Remember the effect that last season's trek to Australia had on the squad, it would be madness for the club to take on a match in the USA at the suggested date. We should be concentrating on CL qualification rather than spending approx 15 hours that would be spent on two long haul flights.}

Agree0 Disagree0

26 May 2012 00:44:34
just seen the mora's transfer gossip on bbc sport website sayin leicester closing in on kelvin wilson in a swap deal with matt mills goin the other way so looks now defo gittin mills canny be any worse than wilson but no the comandin cb a wid a liked tae see us git

HH


gunniebhoy

Believable4 Unbelievable1

Don't want to get rid of wee kelvin, he's a good young player, the kind Lenny wants to kepp and mould. IMO

Agree0 Disagree0

Is that the same wee, young Kelvin Wilson thats 6 foot 3 and 27 in september? Hes suspect at the back, punt him and get someone else in.

Agree0 Disagree0

26 May 2012 00:18:41
I was messing about with the search button and found this. It needs posted again.

14 Apr 2012 12:41:22
tae the tune ae auld shep, ( bit the names chinjid tae "BLUE" fur the rangurs)

when ah wiz ah lad,
n ah didnt have a dad,
n ladies n frends ah hud nun,
so ah wundurd jist whit cood ah dae wae masell,
ah desidit thit ahd be a ***

jist a boay n hiz teem,
n the league ah hud seen,
bit it didnae seem thit they cood score,
they wur s**t that wiz it,
so ah sade tae massell,
must be sum mare tae this bore.

now auld blue made me spew,
thurs mare thin me in the queue,
thit hatit auld blue oan that nite,
bit ma teem ah dont change,
even though they wur mange
we agreed thit oor team wur jist s**te.

then it chainjid we wun cups,
though thur wiz sum hiccups,
n we stertit tae sign sum big stars,
littul did we no then,
s**te wid cum bak agane,
only this time weed land oan oor arse,

noo thurs duff n duffur tae,
bills n taxes NO WAY,
sale sharks n blue nites stertit speekin,
iz big fergie wid say, thit thur wull cum ah day,
when wur arses in wur pants wull stert SQUEEKIN

so we looked tae the sky,
bit they sent us a PIE,
a rangurs man n a fan we wur told,
he wiz fat n full ah s**te,
n hiz name wiz craig whyte,
n auld blue wiz aboot tae be sold!

ma auld man he wid rave
'noo heed turn in hiz grave,
tae see auuld blue n the mess we ur in,
jist a boay n hiz team,
owe shedloads tae the queen,
who'd huv thote thit we'd end in the bin.

liquidation it seems,
fur wan ae eurups auld teams,
tae go away n cum bak a new co.
miller lite n bill NG,
they huv ur aw talkin big,
bit nut wan ae thum huz shown thur dough.

noo auld blue iz a team,
suisidul it seems,
n we wundur when wull it aw end
fae the debt we waant free,
start agane in div 3,
its drivin us rite roon the bend,

its aw doon tae wee pat,
cums fae posso the rat,
heez been runnin uz doon sumthin shokin,
he shood leev us alane,
let us suffur oor pain,
insteed its auld blue heez bin mockin.

so is aff tae the sarrie,
if ma wee legs wull carry,
thurz wee sally n big davo murry,
but care fur blue? thurs nae luk,
cos ah dont gie a fk,
ahd rithur huv beer n eat curry!

so its heehaw fae me,
fk am jist 5 ft 3,
its jist thit SELLIK ur ma team fur life,
wull we miss ye auld blue, hiv a laff jine the queue
ahm jist wurried thit VERAS ma wife.
bbfn pp

Believable2 Unbelievable6

Ha ha Pat, love your lyrics, how can 4 eejits disagree? The work alone amending it requires TALENT. Pat as usual a great big CHAPEUX (that's French for BUNNET) Pat of Posso fame.... LOL Timalloy

Agree0 Disagree0

25 May 2012 23:56:36
With just a few minutes left of this anniversary, i'd like to end it with just two words:
Jock stein.

Believable8 Unbelievable5

Happy days to the ub button pressers.
Just makes it better. Jock stein.

Agree0 Disagree0

Yes it does. jock stein.

Agree0 Disagree0

An even better anniversary coming up on the 28th, Celtic's first goal, Neil McCallum, first win over the dark side, 5-2 win, 1888

Agree0 Disagree0

25 May 2012 23:35:20
Rather rattled now, a good few glasses raised to those men this evening.

And on the last half hour of the 45th anniversary of that great achievement, I would like to thank every single Celtic fan in the world, especially all the bhoys n Ghirls on this website who bring smiles and a good bit of debate as well.

Ed u do a brilliant job and been on the site for a while now and keep coming back because of the folk that here.

Good bless the Celtic family

Hail Hail

Cumby Bhoy

The ppl clicking unbelievable, the just don't want to believe that's all, we all know what happened that night

{Ed007's Note - Thanks Cumby, it's a pleasure to do this site for all the regulars, from both sides. HH mo chara, have a nice night.}

Believable6 Unbelievable5

If calsberg ever did a European cup final then they could never beat that one!

Agree0 Disagree0

One and all! May the current buoys go one better!

Agree0 Disagree0

Bit rangurs wur ment tae win it furst watp.
Oh f*ck it runners up cup wil dae.

Agree0 Disagree0

 
Change Consent