Celtic Banter Archive March 06 2013

06 Mar 2013 23:21:55
see my post at 18:41:20. juve 2-0. don't even know what price for that. just can't bet against celtic. shammy

06 Mar 2013 21:44:52
Out as expected. Decent display though but another gift (izzy) for the second. These are the killing fields, you make a mistake, very seldom do you get away with it. The big plus for me is we do seem to be learning possession is vital at this level. Cut out the individual errors and the aggregate score looks very different. I thought we deserved a goal, on another night and a rub of the green we would have had it, but a great run to get there. On the pressure side, there can be no excuses for not winning the double. You can play that well over two legs V Juve then that's the least you can do now. No shame. A great effort from a run that started in July. green jhedi

06 Mar 2013 21:33:34
90 mins nearly gone. Very proud Celtic fan here. Well done buoys. They did us us proud. Pad

06 Mar 2013 18:41:20
guys and gals, just been to bookies. head ruling the heart £20 juve 2 us 0. can't do that. so bet for tonight, heart over head. £20 juve 1 us 2. 25/1 { hills}. romantic dreamer, I know. but £500 if right come on you hoops. shammy

06 Mar 2013 17:40:27
Could the reason Chico isn't shouting numbers re the puma deal be because its a 'technical deal' Puma's term for when small clubs pay them to manufacture they're tops etc!
Ok Rangers make a profit on the mark up but not exactly the tie in that Chico etc want us to believe
Aarhus1

06 Mar 2013 16:55:32
i know its getting boring now but one thing iv not heard picked up yet on the lms decision is the fact nimmo miss interpreted the tax tribunal decision. nimmo rules the tribunal ruled ebts legal therefore no advantage of withholding side notes but the tribunal didn't rule on weather they where legal or not everyone excepted ebt, s where legal the tribunal was to decide if rangers had used them illegally by forming part of the players contract if that was found rangers would have been found guilty now charge 2 withholding side notes nimmo found them guilty he showed 2 side notes as example and 2 letters sent after ebt, s stating the club would pay them direct, in lord nimmos own words " any one with half a brain at rangers would see that these ebt, s was part of the players contract and why did they not think they should be disclosed to the spl " now what nimmo didn't realise was that statement and his own opinion completely contradicted the tribunal verdict ( that they did not form part of the players contract ) so in his own admission nimmo has stated the ebt, s did form part of the contract and rangers did use them illegally and that in his own opinion the tax tribunal verdict was wrong and rangers should have been found guilty at the tribunal ( according to his own opinion ) so did lord nimmo fully understand the tax tribunal verdict that they where not illegal but used illegally and why did he stand by it in one charge then completely go against it in the other

06 Mar 2013 10:07:50
Last night Roy Keane said of Nani's red card:
"I think the referee has actually made the right call. Everyone's upset about it and it's slightly unlucky, but it's dangerous play. Whether he meant it or not is irrelevant. It's dangerous play - it's a red card. "
I'm not a Manchester United fan and I'm not a Roy Keane fan (although I don't dislike either) but after thinking about it I believe he was right in his judgment. Nowhere in the laws of the game does it say tackles have to be deliberate to warrant a red card.
Your thoughts folks? And please don't have a biased opinion just because you are a fan of or you dislike either party.

Hail Hail
ChrisBhoy

06 Mar 2013 01:16:17
How stupid did juve coach conte sound?lol, he said that no player is allowed in the 6 yard box for that is the goalies box and if a player is in it then it is a foul, lol, is this guy serious? Does he go to the school of the newco? Has he ever watched football before and will anyon bring this to his attention or is it up to Lennon to set him straight and the. Have the media make up fuming Lennon stories. What a joke, and I wonder if them or the newco who say standing in front of the golie is a foul were watching the man u vs real game as I saw a couple of times Man United players in front of reals goalie, are they going to go shout from the roof it's a foul? Some people eh make up something else to counter a perfectly correct opinion which the rules point out, Lennon just showed who knows more about football btw the two coaches and conte better be ready for us and what Lennon has in store for tmr, training ground pieces me thinks