Celtic Banter Archive July 03 2014

 

Use our rumours form to send us celtic transfer rumours.

03 Jul 2014 22:12:23
If ronny is looking for a winger surely
Gary mckay stevens would be worth a bid?
And is there any truth in hooper wanting
To come back?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Could mgregor not fill that position? he looked good today wide left

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jul 2014 22:58:23
Wouldn't touch Mackay Steven he's far to incontistent, think I would like to see Johanson played out wide and Biton given a run in the centre. I would also like to see Lustig in the middle of the defence alongside VVD as long as Matthews is fit.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jul 2014 21:35:48
just looking through some the europa qualifying games and nice to see aberdeen winning 4 nil at the minute (real dirty team there playing it seems) but does this result get us coefficient points after all is divided down by all the scottish clubs competing does anyone1 know

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed007's Note - Yes Kieran. In Europe teams get two points for a win and one point for a draw, points are halved for matches in the qualifying and play-off rounds (1 for a win and 0.5 for a draw).}

Thanks ed wasn't to sure what way the whole thing was worked out

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jul 2014 20:26:09
Good to see a lot of the younger players getting a chance tonight, hoping Deila is finally the manager who will bring players from Lennoxtown through to the first team on a regular basis. Still think Pete will have to dip into his wallet for a winger or 2 though. Anyone know any wingers we should be chasing and could realistically sign? I like the 2 Ecuadorians, Monterro and Ibarra

Believable0 Unbelievable0

03 Jul 2014 20:18:20
From the game tonight Fasan looks a better No.2 than Zaluska! Boy looks a talent very nimble for a goalie!

McGregor was best player 2nd half on the park and looks as though he has talent too!

Clearly and most importantly keeper not allowed to "punt ball up the park" ball dispatched to full backs on EVERY occasion a liked the look of that

atb jb7

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed007's Note - I noticed that about the GK's distribution as well JB. It's heartening to see something so simple and obvious being implemented right away.}

Well let's hope we sell big fraz for mega money soon. Big fan of the big man but his football ability has always been a concern and a real weakness in his game. He could get found out if playing from the back is the style of play

Agree0 Disagree0

Maybe when Ronnie sees that by the time we have a couple of passes at the back, our SPL opponents have nine out field players back within 25/30 yds of their goals, he may decide to try to get a quicker way to get the ball up the park.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jul 2014 19:45:07
Jim Tim how do you know what budgets were available to keane and moyes and anyone else who we're interested in they job.reading keane today he said if he took the celtic job he would have to had give up his role with the republic something he didn't, want and that the villa job enabled him to carry on with the republic.i personally didn't, t want keane anywhere near celtic park trouble with a t as far as I'm concerned.killy.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Killy I agree with you, Celtic probably had a lucky escape missing out on Keane .
I don't think its anyone's business how much of a budget Celtic would have available for any new manager . These things need to be confidential.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jul 2014 21:07:41
Strachan is on record saying " you get 5 mill a year to spend @ Celtic" cannot see that having changed especially minus Sevco on the scene atb jb7

Agree0 Disagree0

If I told you that I'd have to kill you.

"I don't think he was getting the conditions he wanted to make the job happen for him.

"There is not going to be £30m-£40m in the kitty to spend, and there is no guarantee that Rangers will come up next season so Peter Lawell is sitting there thinking, 'why would I spend £30m-£40m this year?' Whether Roy will be offered it again, who knows?"

That's Bonner in todays Irish Independent. He's not the first to echo my sentiments.

RK would have known exactly what it would take to manage Celtic and play a hand with the Eire national side before he sat down with PL. As it happens I didn't want Keane, but we'll just stick to our own reasons as to why he, and others knocked us back. Bet we're one of the few clubs to get turned down by managers in need of work this season.

Agree0 Disagree0

I doubt very much if Roy Keane and Peter Lawwell ever sat down to discuss the Manager's job . I think Keane wanted to be the sole candidate, so that his ego wouldn't be upset, by been over looked .

Agree0 Disagree0

OK well maybes not PL himself but he sat down with CFC representatives, and that's according to MO'N.

You're probably right about his ego though yourman. For me, winning the league with Celtic doesn't do a great deal for your reputation as a manager right now. And perhaps Keane knows that and that's another reason. Making in roads in CL though does. Do we have the mentality or the willingness to spend like a CL club though (even one of the poorer ones at best). I don't think we do, otherwise we'd be trying to sign CL standard players before qualifiers. "There are rich teams and there are poor teams, then there's fifty feet of crap, and then there's us", but we can't just accept what seems like a fate.

But as far as mentality of the manager goes at least we've got a man in willing to actually give it a go.

Agree0 Disagree0

Martin O'Neil spoke about Keane and the Celtic job to suit his own agenda . When Martin speaks, he doesn't expect anyone to believe it as gospel. He needed a topic to keep the Irish media from getting on his back so he built up the Keane/Celtic link .
This kept the Irish media from proping again as to why he only watched Irish qualified players who played close to his home in England . Also why the ROI 's FIFA ratings are at their worse ever .

Agree0 Disagree0

So the whole Keane link was a smokescreen set up by MO'N?

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jul 2014 19:29:43
3-1 ft . youngsters done real good . fasan made some good saves, waters at lb was more impressive than twardzik, oconnell is solid mgregor is better than derk and Henderson was every where the bhoy puts in some work, let's hope they all get serious game time this pre season as none of the youngsters looked out of place

Believable0 Unbelievable0

I was very impressed with the team in the second half . Fasan was very secure and certainly didn't want to give up a goal. Gordon may get it very difficult to in goals ahead of this youngster .

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jul 2014 18:39:46
3-1 calum mgregor,, lots of the youngsters on

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Thats for the updates drb

Agree0 Disagree0

Sorry meant thanks

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jul 2014 18:34:44
decent friendly/pre season game so far, the Russians are a decent side, some good movement and shutting down from us mixed with the usual lapses in concentration, nobody been brilliant also nobody been bad, one thing though nobody on our left side can kick the ball with their right foot

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Deep river boy. Not many left sided players can kick a ball with their right foot and vice versa.robben of the Netherlands is an example, first game of pre season friendlies and people are already moaning I give up.killy.

Agree0 Disagree0

How can you say my view of the first half is moaning? and do you not find it restrictive n the team that the whole left side today are almost totally reliant on their left foot? and your view that most players can only use one foot is nonsense

Agree0 Disagree0

Deep river bhoy most left or right footed players are not comfortable with the ball on their so called weaker foot how many times have you seen players in good positions only to waste that position by trying to get the ball on to their favoured side and I am sure you will see it many times this coming season.killy.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jul 2014 18:13:30
2-1 johannsson

Believable0 Unbelievable0

03 Jul 2014 17:55:03
1-1 mistake from mulgrew

Believable0 Unbelievable0

For 5/10 mins around the goal there mid field was given far too much room to place passes on either sides of the centre backs and caused serious pressure on our goal.
However early yet, and I am sure these things will be got right .

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jul 2014 17:36:15
1-0 stokes

Believable0 Unbelievable0

03 Jul 2014 16:11:33
i think gordon will prove a really good signing for us. he's obviously been training with us a long time to prove his injuries are behind him now

also not slating forster or anything but gordon will come at corners/free kicks/crosses and get rid. ed what you make on this signing mate?

do yous all think its the end for forster at celtic?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed007's Note - It's a massive risk. I'm a firm believer that GK is the one position you should never gamble on. GKs are rarely out injured with short-term niggling knocks, if a GK is injured it is usually mid to long term, so if Gordon is to be Forster's understudy and gets injured we are playing a dangerous game having Gordon as No.2, if he was to get inured we could have a serious problem on our hands.
If Gordon is to be our No.1 then we're plumbing the depths of desperation. I can't understand people who say it's a no risk signing, there's the risk of him being our No.1 and getting injured in September when the window is closed or even worse qualifying for the CL and he is our No.1.
Gordon will never be able to claw back the time he has missed and perform to the level he has in the past, his natural instinct and reactions won't be as sharp. I'd also have to, for now anyway, question his subconscious confidence in his own body to challenge in the air and throw his body around in a crowded penalty area. Being put through training drills is a lot different from actually playing in a competitive match.
This deal will more than likely end up being classed alongside the likes of Gravesen and Ljungberg. And let's not forget what happened with Steven Mouyokolo last season.}

I cannot understand this signing . I think with over two years out it will take far too long for him to get his timing and confidence back . It will be difficult for a team that is used to dealing with dead ball situations changing to one that comes out for everything . Mistakes and red faces all round .

Agree0 Disagree0

Surely he has been brought in as a back up keeper.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jul 2014 22:51:28
With Craig Gordon you don't lose that class. He may have had his injuries but like Henrik there will be a mental challenge post injury and I'm sure he will rise to it. To be likened to has beens like Gravesen (he wasn't that bad!) and Ljungeberg is a bit harsh. A one year deal max would have been better.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - 'With Craig Gordon you don't lose that class'. Just let that sink in for a minute everyone, and no laughing at the back.
Look at GK around the same age, Boruc, Valdes, Petr Cech, Casillas and Reina have all deteriorated over the last 4 years whilst playing consistently for their teams, Cassilas captained the WC winners four years ago and look at his performances in Brazil.
Gordon has spent those 4 years battling injuries to his knees and broken arms, he's has played less than 20 matches in those four years yet 'With Craig Gordon you don't lose that class'. Unbelievable! Has Dr Fuentes been treating him?}

Some people must think that after his 27month sabbatical Gordon has comeback as good as ever . I doubt that, maybe he is signed to bring on Fasan . I doubt that too, we will probably have to get use to him .

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jul 2014 14:26:14
In my opinion I would have took westwood
Over gordon he's just been released by sunderland

Believable0 Unbelievable0

03 Jul 2014 17:03:15
Westwoods wages might be a stumbling block. My fear with Gordon is that the board have moved quick to get a nine million pound keeper for free. The fact that the Great Wall didn't play in the World Cup that may put English teams off buying foster, though good qualifying displays could tempt teams but by then Gordon could be proving himself a great keeper again! Forget age van Derek Saar was well into his 30's before Man U snapped him up! Time will tell with Gordon , but if they sell foster for 8-10 million they will just say they got a same priced keeper as a replacement

Agree0 Disagree0

I would've taken anyone who's actually played in the last 27 mths! In all seriousness but, I'd have enquired about several GK's ahead of CG:

- Victor Valdes (Bosman from Barcelona, Monaco have pulled out due to a niggling knee injury)
- Guillermo Ochoa (Bosman from Ajaccio)
- Kasper Schmeichel (before he signed a new deal w/ Leicester)
- Lukasz Fabianski (before he signed for Swansea)
- Mat Ryan (Club Brugge)
- Julian Speroni (Bosman from Crystal Palace)
- Keiren Westwood (Bosman from Sunderland)
- Jack Butland (Stoke)
- Alex Smithies (Huddersfield)

I know some will be unrealistic in terms of competition and wage demands, but if you don't ask then you don't get?!

Agree0 Disagree0

The biggest problem with these players is that even if Celtic wanted some of these keepers, they might not want to come to Celtic especially if Forster is still on Celtic books .

Agree0 Disagree0

I would be very happy with Speroni or Ochoa

Agree0 Disagree0

As I said, if you don't ask you don't get. This negatively assumptive attitude in the transfer market is what hampers progress!

Agree0 Disagree0

I think for many transfer windows Lawwell has asked about different players the manager wanted and who were in budget . Only to be strung a long until the agent got an offer from some team in a bigger league and Celtic were left to buy from the bottom of the pile in the last days of window .

Agree0 Disagree0

Well I think a lot of agreement about this one. However, what's done is done and we move on and hope that (especially for the guys self-esteem and confidence) he comes good and proves us all wrong.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jul 2014 13:02:46
Is the game on TV tonight?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Celtic TV. I think the Hoops Bar in the Gallowgate will have the game on!

Agree0 Disagree0

It's on Celtic TV

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jul 2014 10:12:59
Got to laugh at varying opinions of Celtic fans especially on this site, not in a bad way mind before I get mauled.

Craig Gordon was a good keeper and at 31 is still at an age where if he stays fit can play for another 7 to 8 years. Read what RD says about James Forrest, time to heal from injuries is important. Well if 2 years ain't enough for Gordon then we will find out soon enough.

Now - my concern with this signing is not the player, its what Celtic have been doing for year on year. FF will move on, any player with ambition simply would and he can be a big player at a big club. So here is the Celtic way, sign a keeper for free and sell your No 1 for 8 million plus ( great business, IF CG can stay fit and re-produce the form that he once had but just for once, please make a big money signing )

Now had to laugh yet again that Callum McGregor will be our saving grace. Not a chance in hell. He may well be a decent player at best - he had a good start at the lower leagues of England and then vanished. He was not consistent enough at that level the he certainly is not ready to play for Celtic. Ryan Gauld should have been signed, Sporting Lisbon don't mess around with young players and mark my words, Lisbon will sell in 4 years for a fortune.

Now time will tell if our Academy is any good. But, was it not our Academy that let Robertson the LB at Dundee Utd leave? Now being touted for a 2 million move to the Premiership! Sure someone on here posted before, maybe we do have the talent and its simply the poor coaching that has been the cause of no real stars coming through.

Yeah Fisher, Henderson and Watt have played in the first team, done ok I suppose. But where is our Moravcik type player? Surely there is a Scottish kid out there that has the ability and creativity Celtic need.

So to summarise. I really do hope this is a season to remember. I would be delighted to see CG and even McGregor be successful at Celtic. The more Scottish players in our squad, playing regularly and playing well can also help our national team.

Time will tell fellow Bhoys and Ghirls. let's just sit back and see what happens against the Icelandic team before we make any sort of judgement on manager and players.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Great post, can't fault or disagree with much you've said mate. Be interesting to here what kind of responses you get?!

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jul 2014 13:11:03
good post mate disagre about gauld though good player but don't think he's as good as everybody thinks thoughts?

Agree0 Disagree0

Cheers HB, I always enjoy the reply's.

You just know that someone will get wound up by it and disagree

Agree0 Disagree0

People want Callum mcgregor to get a chance not be a saving grace. I think Callum's season was better than Ryan Gauld who didn't appear in big games when needed that said good luck to the kid at sporting.

Agree0 Disagree0

Good post Kev, I'll disagree with you on the Gauld signing though. Although a cracking player I think we should be looking at trying to bring our own youth through instead of buying a guy that's played 30 odd games for 3 million.

Agree0 Disagree0

I think Ryan Gauld's move to Sporting CP is a good one for him and Scotland's national team, in 5 yrs time he'll fall into the "there's the one that got away" category along with James McCarthy.

There's more chance of him getting playing time and progressing his game at a team with a history of developing youth players (Ronaldo, Nani, Moutinho, Ilori, Dier, etc) than he would in the EPL or Championship!

Also, keeps him out the media spotlight and means he can focus purely on his football.

Haha, true Kev. You'll upset people posting like that!

Agree0 Disagree0

Kev T, correct in many ways. Love Rd's analysis of Forest. Great to see a manager update the fans on team and player issues instead of the usual soundbites that mean SFA. Happy about the CG signing, as long as we sign another keeper if FF goes. I am sure we will. On the whole excited by the prospect of the season ahead. And on your point about the coaching of kids, I expect there will be a root and branch reform of the system, now that we have a new and progressive management team.

Agree0 Disagree0

Btw, some of the players I missed out from Sporting CP's academy were Figo, Simao, Quaresma and current players William Carvalho + Carlos Mane!

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jul 2014 17:57:50
Agreed in general Kev a think CG is a great bit of business

Never said CMcG was to be the saviour but a goal scoring midfielder will always be welcome

as for Gauld it is some money for someone who has played bout 25 FULL games , having said that he looks a talent , atb jb7

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jul 2014 20:22:25
I'd be shocked if Gordon started the season as our number 1. Its only a year from Moukola and look how that turned out. As for the Lubo type player It costs a lot of money to buy a readymade player like that. I've got a feeling Rogic could be a success this season.

Agree0 Disagree0

Kev T, you are not a very positive Celtic fan are you .
None of us can know for certain whether Gauld will be sold for a wee fortune in the future . Who is to say Henderson or some of the other young lads won't come through and become real stars. There is nothing wrong with a bit of optimism especially at this time of year .

Agree0 Disagree0

Well HB we did say there would be one.

Welcome Yourman, out of all the reply's your the negative comment.

Irony!

Agree0 Disagree0

@ 4 & 9

Saviour is maybe a tad too far, wasn't a punt at anyone in particular on the site.

So many people seem to think a decent run at Notts County will make him ready for the top team at Celtic. Its all about opinions and mine would say that he needs to play at a higher level consistently before we play him.

From the crappy online stream I watched, he did seem to play well tonight.

Agree0 Disagree0

Kev T, I am sure every club let's a player go once in a while who goes on to better things . Didn't the great Ferguson let Pogba go and he has done rightly . No club can get it right all the time and that means that supporters shouldn't ram it down the throats of the club when it does .
I rather take the optimistic view and look at our good first team squad, our good younger players and the fact that we now have our own reasonable transfer kitty should those that matter think its needed .
Its a long time since things looked so good and if Ronnie does his job we should be in for good times .

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - Pogba leaving Man Utd was a very similar situation to Feruz leaving CFC, the player's ego was out of control and he had his head turned by people more interested in themselves than the player.
AF never let him go, Utd made him an offer which would have made him the highest paid teenager in Utd's history but he had 'allegedly' already agreed to move to Juventus. Pogba (and his family/agent) never had any intention of signing a new deal at Old Trafford, that's why he was never given a chance in their first team, playing him would have done nothing for Man Utd. Pogba had previously done the same to Le Havre when he joined Utd and when the player did leave AF said:

'It is disappointing. I don't think he showed us any respect at all, to be honest. I'm quite happy that if they (footballers) carry on that way, they're probably better doing it away from us'.}

@jamiebhoy7 Gauld's had 32 starts, 18 sub apps and 9 goals since his debut in May 2012. How many mins has our latest signing played in that same period? That's right, none. Gordon's last game was a month before that!

Agree0 Disagree0

04 Jul 2014 12:39:32
HB think a was more in agreement with you when you highlighted James McCarthy escaping from us and becoming better and of more value , would not have paid £2.8 mill for Gauld oh sorry its "mini messi" now! how unfortunate a mantle is that? bit like stevie fulton / baggio me thinks

We ALL know CG is a punt , time will tell atb hb jb7

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jul 2014 08:08:51
Ronny Deila re James Forrest's injuries:

"James is out for some weeks. We will see what happens in terms of the qualifiers. We will take it from week to week. James is a very explosive player but he has been in and out with injury. Now he has a little trouble with a thigh muscle."

"I don't want to rush James. He has been out for such a long time that he needs time to get his fitness up. I saw in training that he didn't have the fitness needed to be consistent."

"When he is fit, he can start playing games. When you are in and out, you can push too hard to get back and end up having to start all over again."

"It's very important we take our time with him and get out his potential. If it continues the way of the last year or two, that will never happen because of all the injuries."

"It's better to keep him out for a good while now to really get him fit. From there, we can get him into games. James is an exceptional talent but you need that fitness to play game after game."

"The medical staff know what to do with him. It's just about getting the time to do it."

Surely we're best just trying to get him a move elsewhere to free up funds / wages? He's giving Derk a run for his money as The Tampon.

And, RD re Stromsgodset's Martin Odegaard:

"It's incorrect to say that Martin is outwith our range. He must do what is best for him and we will do what is best for us - we'll see if our paths meet at a later date."

"Martin is a good player but not even close to being a Celtic player at the moment. But there's no doubt that he might be in the future."

Believable0 Unbelievable0

I love the way this guy speaks. Really knows what he's talking about and seems to be completely honest about the way he wants us to move forward. I'm not being too optimistic as I'm sure I said the same about Mowbry.

I'm not Forests greatest fan, probably because we've never really seen the best of him because he's constantly injured and I think I've only seen 10 mins of Derk play. It is however a fresh start for everyone and hope that some of our players we deem not to be good enough show us something more.

Agree0 Disagree0

I think that's the point cmcbhoy. With Lennon, Forrest could do no wrong. Lacking form, just back from injury, even spending a night in the cells.

All of the above happened and he was still threw back into the team week after week.

Deila saying he's not going to play him until he's reached a consistent level of fitness is exactly the boot up the backside the wee man needs to kick on his career!

Agree0 Disagree0

Some of the players definitely need a wake up call. I've got a lot of hope for this season and the future of our young players going forward. I hope I'm right.

Agree0 Disagree0

Like many, feel that Forrest never lived up to the hype - injury prone & work shy. I, like most fans would like to see more young talent coming through and getting regular 1st team action. I appreciate that it can't be done overnight but we should be getting abetter calibre of players coming through the academy.

Agree0 Disagree0

Reallistically, comparing our financial power and training facilities to other teams in the Scot Prem, we should be bringing through lads good enough to win the league on their own.

But for some reason it isn't the case.

We should be able to churn team after team for a decade that can remain at the top of the Scottish game, not bringing through one or two players every other season to then get released and go to a Championship or L1 side down South!

Agree0 Disagree0

Come on Lennon's gone and there is no need for some people to use every opportunity to get the boot in . I am sure Lennon was advised by the same medics and experts as Deila has . Every other option has been used with Forrest and really it was probably one of the last options that was left .

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jul 2014 06:55:50
So RD came to Celtic, he's unveiled as "a young, progressive coach and a developer of players"

1st signing is a GK, 31, not played since 2012

Believable0 Unbelievable0

31 is not old for a keeper and you can't deny Gordon was a very good GK. Doubt he's going to be our no1 and really needs to prove himself but if it's a pay as you play deal why the hell not?

Agree0 Disagree0

The fact it says 2 yr deal makes me doubt it's a pay-per-play deal, otherwise it would say so. If he's been signed on a straight forward 2 yr deal then it's a terrible peice of business!

Agree0 Disagree0

It can still be a 2yr contract and a pay as you play hb. I would hope that Celtic wouldn't be as naive not to insert some sort of clause. If it's not then I agree it's a bad piece of business.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jul 2014 13:54:10
I can't imagine for one minute PL had forked out big money on GK, and as for the manager saying he wants youth in sure he does but he's got to be pragmatic as well. He seems a straight shooter to me who isn't going to look at what we have with fresh impartial eyes - ala JF , have we not been crying out for that for ages?

Agree0 Disagree0

That's the CG deal official. It's a 2 yr contract with the club having the option of a 3rd year. No mention of it being a pay-per-play contract?

Agree0 Disagree0

HB we'll never know the full ins and outs of the contract. We could be paying him 2k a week with bonuses for playing.

Agree0 Disagree0

What age was Ronnie Simpson when he came to celtic?, 34 or 35, .

Agree0 Disagree0

I think Craig Gordon will be surplus to requirements . Fasan showed today a great determination to keep a clean sheet. He really was impressive and should be able to build on it .

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed003's Note - you're not going to be surplus to requirements on the day you signed lol. then again funny old game}

03 Jul 2014 01:48:48
Anyone heard if the gordon deal is
Pay as you play? Hope so last thing we
Need is another player injured for most
Of the season getting payed every week

Believable0 Unbelievable0

I'd hope it's pay-per-play. I wonder how much he's picking up? D'you have any idea Ed, roughly?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - Sorry mate, I don't.}

03 Jul 2014 00:44:57

6 June 2014 - Celtic appoint Ronny Deila as their new manager:

Chairman Ian Bankier said: "We are delighted to have secured Ronny as Celtic Manager. He is a highly-regarded individual and a man who we are confident will bring great success to Celtic. He is a forward-thinking coach and manager with a progressive approach. The Celtic Board will support Ronny fully and in every way and we look forward to working with him."

2 July 2014 - Celtic sign Craig Gordon, a 31 year old GK who has not played since 2012, has only played ONE single match since 2011 and a total of 16 matches in the last FOUR years.

Since the last World Cup Gordon has played 16 games of football.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

This is going to be a disaster. Just can't see Gordon reconnecting with form that earned him £9m move to sunderland.

Its a lawell signing. Makes me wonder who is responsible for duds such as boerighter, pukki and balde

Agree0 Disagree0

I think this reaffirms the belief that RD is head coach, nothing more or nothing less. Him n JC train the players, pick the squad / tactics n make the board aware what positions need strengthened. JP watches players in said position then passes a list to PL who decides which one is most suitable.

Agree0 Disagree0

I have had real concerns about our transfer strategy (or lack of it) for ages. We constantly 'miss the boat'.
NL seemed to have ongoing problems with the Board and it would be very interesting to hear his thoughts now.
It's hard enough being a selling club and constantly losing our better players; but they have to be replaced with similar or better quality/potential or the games a bogie with mediocrity on the pitch, lack of success and fans frustration and backlash.
The current squad needs additions and improvement in quality and RD must have seen this by now.

JJ

Agree0 Disagree0

Listen to yourselves, cup always half empty. Say Gordon does regain his form. He must have impressed in training to earn a contract and PL will have conditions typed into the contract. What if this, What if that, my heid is sore reading this crap. Gordon is a Celtic Player now so what about giving him a chance. Ronny has only taken a couple of training sessions and youz lot are questioning why he has not bought a multi million pound footballer yet. We are Celtic Supporters, Faithfull.
Hail Hail

Agree0 Disagree0

Yeah, I've said for ages that Peter Lawwell is becoming more a director of football by the second, with John Park his assistant. What knowledge does Lawwell have to be doing this job? Nowhere near enough in my opinion - if he wants to run the club this way, cool, but get in someone qualified. From the U21's right through the development squad, to the first team, we have players who are simply not good enough. We have far too many numbers, and not 1 player who could go to a top top club and be a first pick. All these wages could be going towards a smaller/tighter squad of quality. From the youth up, hopefully our new manager can start to work his way through all the mediocrity, and as I said Lawwell should know his limits, or move on.

Agree0 Disagree0

This is the reason the gap between us (and the league the media always compare us too) and the EPL keeps getting bigger.

We bring through and/or buy youngsters, develop then sell them like we have with Wanyama, McGeady, Ki and Hooper. All went for fees between £5.5m and £12.5m, but we can't keep doing that on the cheap side of the scale.

Once we've done it with several players, we should then push the fees we spend and demand from others for our players up.

That way we develop on and off the field, as well as moving with the rest and not getting left behind like the rest of Scottish football.

The way I see it is the board will sell Fraser Forster for £9m (as well as punting or releasing Zaluska) and say we've replaced him with a £9m player already. Albeit our new £9m player hasn't kicked a ball since April 2012 and has a long history of knee problems that he visited specialists in America and Spain regarding!

Agree0 Disagree0

It's that kind of nonsense (over and over / faithful through and through, etc) that's allowed the board to call our bluff time and time again in recent years.

No one's questioning why RD's not bought anyone yet, because he's kept us in the know by saying he wants to run the rule over what he's got first.

People are disgruntled that we've brought a manager in from Norway, with little to no knowledge of the Scottish game, and are expected to believe he went "Aye, give me that Gordon fella who hasn't played football for over 2 yrs!"

Agree0 Disagree0

@4. A club competing in champions league group stages 2 years running, should not be taking a gamble on a goalkeeper who has been out the game for over 2 years, is injury prone and barely kicked a ball since last world cup. There is no viable argument in his favour.

Agree0 Disagree0

DN30 you do not lose all that talent jist cause yir knees been a bit sore for 2 years. He must have impressed in his trial and he must have been medically tested to see if his knee will stand up to the pressures that come with being a Goalkeeper. I reakon its a great signing for us and for him, he will be back in the Scotland Team in no time. Hail Hail

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - The problems with his knees was a lot worse than them being 'a bit sore', Tam. We'll find out how strong his knees (plural), arms and his confidence are when he gets his first clatter during a game. Gordon is one bad landing or bump away from crippling himself, and he won't be truly tested until he plays in a competitive match.
Right away any opposition team will target him as a weak link in the team, players like Chris Sutton and Hartson would have relished the chance to play against a crock GK, why won't physical players like Jason Scotland and John Sutton feel the same?
Would you be so happy if we signed a new CB or RW who hadn't played a single match in the last 2 years? If Bobby Petta could prove his fitness should we sign him as well, he's played more football than Gordon in the last couple of years.
If any other SPFL team had signed Gordon we'd have been pi$$ing ourselves laughing, especially if it was Sevco. They're taking pelters from all directions, including their own fans, for signing Miller and Boyd, us signing Gordon is x10 worse than that.}

Ed, its not a case of if you are happy or not. We will not know until he is tested but I say again the medical and training he has done to earn the contract must have been severe. I am willing to give him the benefit of the doubt and we will just have to wait and see. Best case scenario would be for Big FF to stay 1 more season and ease CG in slowly. he has my full backing, a cracking keeper in his time and a steal if he gets back to being half as good as he once was. Hail Hail

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - And the deal's been all done and dusted with the very minimum, if any, input of the manager.}

TamTimTic are you serious? Knee injuries are possibly one of the worst a footballer can get. I know this first hand cause I had to give up playing cause my left is f*cked. Its even worse for a goalkeeper.

Picture the scenario. its clear one of the goalkeepers on our books is away, say zaluska (outside bet). Forster gets injured and Gordon replaces him. Gets injured as well. We are in the sh@t. I know who I will be blaming- lawell

Agree0 Disagree0

02 Jul 2014 23:55:27
So we have signed Craig Gordon on a 2 year deal, I don't know what to think of this signing he has obviously done something to get a contract but as said in earlier posts if big FF goes and he's our number 1 I fear for us if a) he's not up to it or be b) gets crocked could leave RD scating on thin ice if things unfold either way.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

My worry is what if FF goes and so does Zaluska? Knowing the Celtic way, both will leave n we'll only have Gordon n the youth lads (Fasan n McCabe come to mind), we could be left well short at the most important time of the season - the European qualifying stages!

Agree0 Disagree0

 
Change Consent