Celtic Banter Archive May 24 2016

 

Use our rumours form to send us celtic transfer rumours.

24 May 2016 20:31:40
Hi Ed: i know you said earlier that it was not the Fee paid for any player but the wage cap @ CP.
Got to say totally bang on, I know that raising the cap will cost more, but if we raised it to say £35k per week tops we move into a whole different player level, and not just an over rated EPL player .

Believable1 Unbelievable1

{Ed007's Note - I've said it for a few years now mate, it would mean us shopping in a whole different market.}

24 May 2016 23:03:22
Totally agree , there are 1000's of quality players within our budget if our scouts can be bothered getting off their arses and go a bit further afield than Dundee. In this present climate we can't afford to be paying 6 million on transfer fees alone then same again on wages on a player. 40k a week 2 million a year on quality is better than spending 7 million on transfer fees alone on duds like Pukki , Boerrigter and Scepovic .

Agree1 Disagree0

24 May 2016 22:19:36
Why couldn't we cut the squad down to about 30 players max (including youth) and add the money saved to the money already willing to be spent and then increase the wage structure and as an extra motivator to new and current players offer them an increase in wage the following season depending on performances (individually and collectively) and loyalty.

Agree2 Disagree1

24 May 2016 22:46:57
I think it's better to have 1 quality player on say 35k than 2 average players on 17k. have a smaller squad made up of a few quality players who can genuinely make a difference in Europe and the rest from the academy who have potential

So instead of 24 players on 10k-18k

Have 8-10 players on 30-35k

So even through your paying higher rates of pay, the wage bill could stay the same.

Any thoughts bhoys.

Agree2 Disagree0

24 May 2016 23:13:46
I would rather have a smaller squad with a mix of better quality signings and the cream of our development crop on a slightly higher salary cap, than like we have had recently - flooded with mediocrity and misfits.

Agree3 Disagree0

24 May 2016 23:56:55
How do you motivate a guy who is quarenteed £35 thousand a week doesn't matter how bad or good he plays?

Agree1 Disagree1

25 May 2016 10:14:00
Aindoh the same applies to any player, regardless of salary. If salary payments were dictated by a motivation clause most of us would be lighter in the pocket on any given month.

The Club has paid top dollar to secure, what I believe to be, the best manager available. I think it has been a massive coup, and the reaction of the football public to the appointment would back that up. It is BR's job (and the staff he appoints) to ensure that the players he brings in have the ability, character and motivation to play for our Club. Winning trophies and competing in European Competition in a packed Celtic Park (this appointment will see this happen) and taking home £35k a week should be enough motivation in my book.

There is no question that DD has stood up and made a notable appointment. He has paid handsomely to secure a top class manager. Regardless of the snipers, BR came within a slip of winning the EPL. I don't agree with the theory that this was down to him being lucky enough to inherit Suarez. Sure it helps, but it takes more than one player to win a league.

United, Chelsea and City have all been accused of 'buying success', a term that doesn't sit right with me. How else can you guarantee success if you don't pay for it? It certainly doesn't come free. We have all witnessed the mediocrity of the market we have been shopping in over the past number of years. It has driven the fans away in their hoards and seen us embarrassed by Scandinavian teams on vastly inferior budgets, teams we would usually be rubbing our hands at drawing in qualifiers. DD has taken the first step, the right step. Now it is time to finish the job. Sign the £35k players I say, and take the Club back to where it belongs.

Agree1 Disagree0

25 May 2016 11:20:50
What I mean is the £35thousand is meaningless, its the motivationan that is important, how many of the Molde team that embarrassed us were on more money than the Celtic players?, there is tactics and team selection and having the confidence to go with young players, and other things that are more important than paying some overated underperforming socalled superstar.

Agree1 Disagree0

24 May 2016 17:09:54
Many if not most Celtic supporters have little time for Peter Lawwell and John Park .
I think most of us would want rid of Park as soon as possible, he seems to be an invisible man, not doing anything . At least he doesn't take the credit or responsibility of doing anything and us fans don't like this particular mystery.
Peter Lawwell is a different kettle of fish, his responsibilities have a very wide-span across many departments within the club and especially with the acquisition and disposal of footballers, it is probably very unwise to get rid of him in the same summer as we appointed a new manager .
It didn't work well for Manchester Utd and I don't think we should risk B R 's early Celtic career by getting rid of PL.

Believable1 Unbelievable2

{Ed007's Note - If Lawwell would stick to doing what he's good at I wouldn't have a problem with him at all. We can't fault him when it comes to looking after the Club's finances and I'm hoping that with the coming investment in the squad, new sponsorship deals etc we can push the boat out and pay wages to attract better players. You know the wages is my main gripe, Chris, rather than the fees we pay.}

24 May 2016 18:25:54
I agree with Ed plenty of good player out there in our price bracket if we just lift the wage cap a little.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 May 2016 19:29:34
I bet Sevco wished they'd had Lawwell these last few years, I doubt very much if they would have been in the mess they are in.
I think he needs to show people that he has the best interests of Celtic at heart, and that he isn't making decisions to ensure that he gets his bonuses.
Most fans are realistic, we know that we haven't got a lot of money to spend, all that most supporters want is for the club to do everything they can with the budget they have. Too often in the last few years, the club seems to have taken the fans for granted. I hope the lesson has been learned.

Agree5 Disagree1

{Ed007's Note - Good post, Gerry.}

24 May 2016 19:44:04
Hail Hail Gerry.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 May 2016 20:49:25
Correct Gerry and well put.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 May 2016 22:07:11
Ed. I don't like John Park been a man of mystery, we don't know is he reporting to Lawwell or to the Manager. Can the Manager trust Park?
Is it good that Lawwell is with us so long, does his length of service temp him into interfering in other people's work? I wonder has D D felt Lawwell was getting too big for his boots and maybe he is trying to cut him down to size.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - I get the impression Lawwell has been reeled in by the board, he's definitely keeping a lower profile than usual.}

25 May 2016 22:42:01
There is a place for Peter Lawwell, as long as he knows it and stays within.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 May 2016 13:58:04
Hi bhoys. Been following this site for a long time now and really enjoy the banter and different opinions. Hopefully with BR in place we can now turn our great club around and get back to where we once were in Europe. Don't expect it to happen overnight but hopefully with some quality signings and some of our young lads being introduced to the 1St team squad we will start to get back to where we once belonged. Hail Hail

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed007's Note - Welcome aboard mate.}

24 May 2016 14:19:22
Cheers Ed.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - (yes)

24 May 2016 17:10:22
Celtic54: Welcome to the best forum going mate, another brother to our family.

Hail hail.

Agree2 Disagree3

24 May 2016 20:01:28
aye welcum again fae me wee pat listen ther used tae be a 54 bus thit came rite thru posso it wiznae you wiz it?
ur did yur maw jist huv a big famuly n couldnae be bothered to make up names.

Agree1 Disagree4

24 May 2016 10:48:01
Looking forward with BR and PL regarding keeping club going with good buys and youth whilst keeping club solvent. An attacking team, with a settled defence is a must. Priority is a cf who can help augment griff with goals and assists. Meanwhile on the other side of the city, looks like JB will blow away the wage structure. Quelle surpris! 😞.

Believable3 Unbelievable0

24 May 2016 17:13:39
Might be wrong Norway but I think I saw he was the same as the Liverpool lad 9k. If true he must of been after a longer contact and to be starting every game. Wouldn't want him here but he is a good signing for them nonetheless.

Agree0 Disagree1

24 May 2016 18:51:44
I'm looking out for the best odds on the new clubs latest signing getting sent off in our first game against them.

Agree0 Disagree0

25 May 2016 08:43:03
I've got 1/ 100 arrow on him being in a jail or an infirmary before that.

Agree0 Disagree0

25 May 2016 09:48:44
leave it tae wee pat oan baith accoonts jt.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 May 2016 09:22:32
Have to say I was impressed with yesterday and the way Rodgers has brought himself across to the Celtic fans.

There is a bit of a buzz about us now that we have been lacking for a while.

Will this be enough to get people out to the matches and get the banners down?

I really hope so.

Believable7 Unbelievable0

24 May 2016 11:48:49
sorry garlic boay a wid love tae no whit yur sayin bit a canae speek garlic.

Agree0 Disagree10

24 May 2016 12:16:54
There'll probably always be that wee naging doubt of whether he'd jump ship if the EPL came calling again but I have to say yesterday he came across impeccably and looked as if he was genuinely delighted to be here so we can only take him on that.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 May 2016 08:16:34
Some commitment jolly 12month contract.

Believable1 Unbelievable1

24 May 2016 08:53:24
Rolling contract, The same as what Lenny and Ronny had. I will give PL credit for these type of contracts it protects the Club. What if he signs a 4 year contract and is awful, We sack him and have to pay 3 years worth. For me rolling contract suits everyone don't look too much into it if Brendan is successful why wouldn't he want to stay for 10 in a row and a crack at the Champions League.

Agree1 Disagree1

24 May 2016 10:11:01
Celtic have been using rolling contracts since Martin oneill have they not??

Agree1 Disagree0

24 May 2016 10:44:34
More than likely Kev.

Agree1 Disagree0

24 May 2016 11:29:57
Aye kev. O'Neil was definitely on a years rolling contract he was the first as far as I can remember. It suits both parties.

Agree1 Disagree0

24 May 2016 11:50:17
Thought that so what's the problem with Rogers being on one then?

Agree0 Disagree0

24 May 2016 12:19:12
Kev83 it's obviously a positive if we don't need to pay a load of money to get rid but some folk don't like the idea of the manager being able to just say cheerio if he has a decent season and then gets offered another job.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - We'd need to pay him a years salary (and possibly bonuses) if we got rid of him and if he resigns he needs to give a years notice or lose his pay-off.}

24 May 2016 12:51:46
I knew about the one year pay off Ed but didn't realise it worked in our favour the other way. So essentially it's like a provisional 2 year deal in a way?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - Yes mate.}

24 May 2016 16:53:25
I like the idea of a one year rolling contract and think many clubs use it with their manager.
I thought MO'N was initially on a 3 yr contract and I remember at the time that I thought it was very short as three years I felt, at that time was hardly long enough to sort the club out for the reasonably short term future .
Now too many people seem to think.3 months is a long time for any manager to get it sorted.

Agree0 Disagree1

24 May 2016 18:27:14
He was old bhoy but when he signed his second contract it change to a rolling one.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 May 2016 22:11:27
Yes Kev83 that's the way I saw it . Peter Lawwell seems to have introduced the rolling contract to Celtic.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 May 2016 01:28:23
It's good to see how the hacks on sky sports work. Celtic fc still have their council and confidentiality a few ex Bhoys were on the payroll tonight . thought they were all consuming not in Glasgow it looks well done Pedro.

They were on to discuss all concerned in Manchester eye eye . Neil and Martin on tap. wonder why Roy wasn't playing ball I'm ' rather glad about that,

Sorry, Ed I know you are Keen on Keane. 🍀🍀 spot on With Brendan though HH Amigo⭐️.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed007's Note - I didn't want Keane to get the job, I wouldn't mind him as a No.2 now though but that's never going happen.}

24 May 2016 02:01:54
I'd take big yogi any day of the week. Managers have it easy but real coaches have a tough gig. I had a chuckle watching LVG telling the world Jose visited him on a weekly basis to give the Barselona team talk.

No wonder football is ****ed. Brian Clough used to hand brown envelopes out on the bus on the same routes and won old big ears twice with Forest,

Look what happened this year with a good coach. Managers are long gone dinosaurs. guy's like Roy Keane are well spent forces but his ego won't allow him to work up here it's a shame but for 2.5 million reasons Brendan will.

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - I'd be happy with Hughes but as long as Rodgers had met him and OKd it. I sitll don't think you can discount guys like O'Driscoll or Colin Pascoe but for me he needs someone with experience and knowledge of the Scottish game. I don't think Kennedy has that yet.
I told my nephew the other week about Rodgers getting the job and told him how I knew, he went to bed tonight expecting MON to take over from Park, Keane as No.2 and Larsson as coach because Ibrahimovic is signing! :=D Thank God I'm not cleaning his bed sheets!}

24 May 2016 04:18:17
I'd be happy with Hughes as a no. 2 and then take over in a couple of years when BR would move on. Hughes would be a great motivator for the team, the passion he has is second to none.!

Agree0 Disagree0

24 May 2016 11:36:40
When Rodgers was talking about how good the coaches and managers up here were all a could think was he's been told he's getting someone from up here as no 2. A know he said he knows the club well enough to bring in someone on his own after that but the alarm bells were already ringing. A hope they don't force anyone on him.

Agree1 Disagree0

24 May 2016 11:42:03
Would Jim Duffy be a good choice for number 2 lads.

Agree1 Disagree1

24 May 2016 11:56:40
Jim Duffy would be a very good appointment to celtics coaching staff.
Knows the Scottish game inside out and is a very good man.
Same with yogi but I still think Rogers will get his own man in.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 May 2016 12:23:09
I hope he does Kev because its important to be comfortable with your numbed 2, maybe Jim would be a good choice the way GS brought TB into the coaching set up.

Agree1 Disagree0

24 May 2016 14:52:35
Regardless who it is, it must be BR who appoints. I personally think that is a major factor as to why it never worked out for RD, the forced appointment of JC.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 May 2016 16:16:39
I think it's will be some one he has worked with before perhaps Warburton 😁.

Agree2 Disagree0

24 May 2016 22:14:05
The assistant coach seems to have taken a far more important role in recent years . I think years ago a good assistant would be seen and not heard.

Agree0 Disagree0

 
Change Consent