Celtic Banter Archive February 23 2015

 

Use our rumours form to send us celtic transfer rumours.

23 Feb 2015 20:36:49
Evening folks, can someone shed some light on this for me, having bought my ticket for final against Utd when should I expect it to be sent in post? On another point why is it a former bluenose in billy Dodds to come out and say he sees nothing wrong in delia and the players actions after the inter game and it just seems to be ex celtic players or ex Liverpool player who always said he had affections for the hoops, to put a dampner on what I thought was an amazing night at celtic park, really getting on my tats now these folk

Believable3 Unbelievable0

Notice who the ex-players are mate? They all played in same team as Lennon and are close friends. Before anyone jumps the gun, I am not saying anything bad about Lennon. Merely stating an opinion that perhaps Lennon parting company was not as amicable as he is trying to portray, but more something along lines he was told contract was not getting renewed and as a result sutton and co have major gripe with Deila.

I personally don't pay attention to them. They think they are the elite race when it comes to commenting on Celtic

Agree5 Disagree3

Sutton used to have a right go at Celtic even when Lennon was in charge. He does this really annoying thing where he always compares the current team to the one that he played in. It's a daft way to look at things because Ronny doesn't have 5 or 6 million to throw at a complete, experienced player so under the circumstances he, and Lennon to an extent, have achieved a good standard with the resources they were given.

Agree0 Disagree0

Think it just annoys me most with Sutton as I really did admire him when he was here, there was one game which if I'm honest I can't recall but certainly remember Sutton slating celtic s defence, it was high scoring game which we won and all I could think was . How can you say things like that after you played against juventus in probably the best European game I've seen . 4-3 at home . There was no bleeding about the defence then!! Just gets my blood up the big twat

Agree0 Disagree0

I don't know what was wrong with the players doing a lap of honour on Thursday night.
I was glad to be able to applaud the players for a magnificent effort against a good team, and I imagine the players wanted to thank the fans for the wonderful backing they gave the team.
I haven't heard the comments, but do these people believe that the players should have just walked off the pitch, without acknowledging the crowd.
I thought it was great that the players showed their appreciation to the fans, and I enjoyed being able to thank them for their efforts, it capped a great night.
Sadly a lot of the pundits seem to think the fans don't matter, or are jealous of the respect these players were shown.
In these days of football mercenaries and money being the be all and end all, I thought it was brilliant that the team and fans were able to thank each other for making it a very special occasion.

Agree0 Disagree0

The thing with Sutton, Hartson etc is that they played in a very good team made up of players many of whom cost a lot of money. The team we played on Thursday cost £11mil to assemble. To put that in perspective Sutton and Hartson cost £12mil combined, and that was 15 years ago. They need to stop comparing the team to the one they played in, I mean it had Larsson in it for christ sake.

Agree0 Disagree0

It was a great game on thursday, and it was a great performance by Celtic, entertainment wise, but it had so many bad bits to it, the defence was baad, apart from Gordon making some real bloopers, there was so much you could criticise about the central defenders, the passing and movement of the whole team was good till came to making the final pass, I lost count of the number of final passes that went an inter player, the spirit in the team seemed to be good, Ijust knew that we were going to get a result in the end, I never heard what Sutton or Mcmanaman said in thier commentary, but I could see where people could criticise the performance.

Agree0 Disagree0

Football is part of the entertainment industry (I know for many it is more than just a show) and as such, has to engage with the audience. A good show has the patrons/audience on its feet in appreciation. This was no different. We held our own against a team which, like Barcelona, on paper should have walked over us. I appreciated the hard work and entertainment provided and I was also more than happy to acknowledge that. The team know they worked hard, they know they fought back and, more importantly, they entertained us and gave us hope for the return game. They also know that, but for a few mistakes, they could (should) have won the game. Stuff all those who spit out the dummy (Sutton is a frustrated manager who can't get a job at that level so he criticizes, methinks).
When he has managed a few teams successfully, then I might take notice of what he (and any other ex-player) says about running a team and what they should/should not do. Until then. he is star from the past and has had his time.

Agree0 Disagree0

Aindoh I get the gist of what your saying mate, but let's put it simple terms, if every player on the park ( both teams ) played a perfect game then there would be more chance of 0-0 results in every game . Football for me is about coming away from the ground still buzzing from I've just watched and although it's few and far between just now, Thursday's game was brilliant to be there, the atmosphere unbelievable, I was sitting next to a group of auld yins all in their late 60 s to 80 s and they were going nuts at the end, just grabbing the closest person to them cuddling them, for me that's what it's all about who cares about wee mistakes here and there aslong as I get that feeling after a game I'll be a happy bhoy

Agree0 Disagree0

Aindoh, you are a little harsh Gordon had a nightmare, I think everyone would agree with that. The defence can't be too bad apart from that as inter didn't get too many chances .
Our final ball was excellent on some occasions as we sliced Inter open on a number of times.
Now remember Inter have had far higher quality of players than we have, their bench would be valued at a number times our whole squad .

Agree0 Disagree0

Chris "the defence can't be too bad", is a strange thing to say when we have conceded 22 goals in Europe this season. There is no doubt we are improving as a team and that we will win most games domestically (sometimes at a canter). But Europe is the only place we truly get tested, and to lose 22 goals doesn't augar well for progression. though I still think we can take Inter I would be surprised if it was done with a clean sheet.None of the teams we have played in Europe this season are normally CL standard either maybe with exception to Inter who obv didn't make it this year.

Agree0 Disagree0

Rayman . I think even you who are as negative as one could find, would admit that there is little or no comparison between how well our team has played this year compared to pre Christmas and especially in August, September and October when Deila was getting used to the strengths and weaknesses of our squad and building on the strengths and reducing the weaknesses. Most of us are happy with the progress . Deila is less concerned about the loss of goals, than you obviously are as he is quite happy to concede goals in any game , as long as the team scores more . If nil all draws or one nil victories are your cup of tea, then I doubt when Deila has the team implementing his ideas fully Celtic won't be playing your way.

Agree0 Disagree0

Chris, never said I was happy with 0-0 draws. Don't put words in my mouth. I have stated a fact we have conceded 22 goals. This is nothing to be proud of but if we win the Europa cup conceding 100 goals I will be ecstatic but you
cant win euro trophies this way unless you have the talents of barca for eg.Its got nothing to do with negativity its reality. I also happy with the progress now but that doesn't mean its a certainty to continue, like everythin else Chris it can improve but it can also get worse that's the harsh reality it doesn't mean I negative. We all go to games in the positive frame of mind of beating a barca say in the CL it doesn't mean we will win it. I would also be amazed if RD wasn't concerned about the number of goals we conceding in Europe any manager wud.

Agree0 Disagree0

Its not being negative to highlight the fact that the defence could be iimproved, all the best teams were built from the back, your deluding yourself if you think if we lose 3 then we will just have to score 4, the team now is a big improvement on the murrayfield one, but that had more to do with RD fnding his feet(his own feet) rather than finding the strengths and weakness's of the squad, I think that the scotland centre half, can't remember his name, hanley or martin, not as technically gifted as vvd or denayer, but maybe a more steady conservative player, or there must be a young mcleish or holton out there, ie a no nonsense ch, there were a few in the wc, but I can't remember their names, but maybe if vvd and denayer get better coaching, (not having a go at RD ) they can remember that they are defenders

Agree0 Disagree0

Rayman, I think most Celtic fans see a big improvement in the Celtic team since the turn of the year . I would think that our improvement is more important than going on about the concession of goals which mostly came about during Deila's very early months . Every other manager this century started off with some sort of working knowledge of some of the Celtic players, the Celtic team and Scottish Football. Deila had to bring himself up to the mark in practically no time . I think this is more worthy of mentioning than the early concession of a crowd of goals . Last week we conceded three bad goals to Inter Milan but Rayman be honest before the match last Thursday would you have accepted a draw?

I will just repeat that under Deila we are likely to get high scoring games .

Agree0 Disagree0

23 Feb 2015 20:26:04
Just seem Jose on goals on sunday getting tore right into sky, was great tv about time someone gave it to them large. Anyway on to thurs I believe all the players need to be at their best for us to go thro but there is 3 players for me who will need to be at the top of their game and that's VVD, Denayer, and CG. It would be difficult to think they are in for an easy night so if they perform to their best for me we will go thro, as I think we got enough up top to beat Inter.So no basic mistakes keep it tight and I am convinced we will score over there.

Believable1 Unbelievable3

Rayman I agree you highlight the three we need to perform at their very best. However it is an eleven man effort to ensure that our goalie and centre back perform to their highest standards . If the Italians are given time and space they will either cut us open with long balls, or by dribbling and passing through our defence, we have to pressurise them all over the place .

Agree0 Disagree0

All we have to do is play like we did at CP minus the goalie mistakes and we will be fine

Agree1 Disagree1

Minus the defence mistakes, don't put all the blame on CG,

Agree0 Disagree0

23 Feb 2015 15:00:15
Does anyone know why we wore black armband yesterday.

Believable1 Unbelievable1

I don't know the gentleman's name but he had worked for Celtic FC since 1938 and had passed away last week. If anyone has his name would be pleased to know.

Agree0 Disagree2

{Ed007's Note - Andy McCann had been one of the groundsmen at CP since 1978, he died on Friday aged 77.}

23 Feb 2015 17:06:09
If I am correct it was for one of our ground staff who died suddenly, last week Apologizes for not having his name, he was very well know to all the players.
Thoughts and regards to his family

Thanks

Agree0 Disagree2

23 Feb 2015 09:17:52
Going to get in early with team for Thursday. I would play 10 of 11 that played last week except Comons for Griffiths, my reasoning being that we will need to retain the ball better over there and Commons with his passing ability will do this, Griffiths I would bring on in second half when Inter tire a little to use his pace to both give us an out ball and a chance of attacking them. Mathews and Izzy must be more disciplined and not both charge upfield at same time, Brown will need to sit deeper also to cover when either full back does come forward. Reason I chose Guidetti over Griffiths is that he can hold ball up and is a threat in the air.

Believable0 Unbelievable14

Griffiths did quite well at hustling their back two and being a bit of a nuisance, don't know if Commons could do that for much of the game! Glad Mackay-Steven and Armstrong were rested yesterday though, hopefully hopefully they're full of as much energy as last week.

Agree1 Disagree1

Interesting not starting a striker. I get your reasoning. Would probably be commons making way for Griffiths as he just doesn't have the legs for a full 90. If we can go in at half time level I think our fitness showed against them we could push on in the final half hour or so for a win. Think Matthews showed that bombing on can be beneficial but as you say, either or full back has to tuck in when the other does. We can't afford to give Shaquiri or Guarin the space over there.

1-0 the hoops!

Agree0 Disagree1

We need to win the game so it's a bit risky going without a recognised striker. I reckon he'll go for Commons just off Guidetti or Griffiths. I wouldn't like to pick who to leave out for Commons right enough but he'd be worth playing for his set piece delivery alone.

Agree0 Disagree0

I wouldn't be surprised if he goes with the same team that started last Thursday.
I think if Griffiths was going to be left out of the team on Thursday, he would probably have started yesterday, the same goes for Armstrong and Mackay-steven.
I hope they find a way of protecting Izzy on Thursday, as although I rate him going forward, defensively he gets caught out a bit, and I think Inter will try and target him.

Agree0 Disagree1

Reading the opening post I'm confused, you said your only change would be Commons for Griffiths, but at the end you said you'd start Guidetti ahead of Griffiths?

I would actually make the 2 changes, Commons for GMS(because a feel as if Commons strength and hold up play can get us up the park and keep us up the park plus will ping a few from 25 yards), and Guidetti for the same outlet to get us up the park plus a think his power and pace could tire the Italian defence out for Griffiths movement later on

Agree3 Disagree1

23 Feb 2015 13:13:24
Think a may be the only 1 who wouldn't start commons lol we will need legs and pace on the attack and for me commons slows everything down and even though he does carry our best attacking threat his ball retention especially away in europe is pretty poor and could end up costing us, I would have the same midfield as last thursday but start guidetti ahead of griffiths cause even though grifffiths has done great I just think away in the san siro he can't do the 1 man upfront job but I think guidetti could

Agree1 Disagree0

@Gunniebhoy maybe it would be a shout to throw on Commons after 60 minutes or so if we're chasing a goal. He might cope better against tired legs.

Agree1 Disagree0

Same Gunnie, probably should have said. And for the same reasons. Commons for me would be more effective coming on against a tiring side. Start Guidetti and Armstrong. Bring on Commons and Griffiths. Griffiths can stretch them and Commons can find him or find himself in a shooting position. Think it'll be a big game for GMS myself. Seems like the most capable player of stretching them individually. Hoping our dynamic midfield can make a few late runs and the likes of Johansen, Armstrong and GMS can arrive late unmarked if JG can hold it up.

Agree0 Disagree0

23 Feb 2015 17:37:19
Aye a would keep commons fresh for the last half hour cause if the game is tight and we are still in it I would rather have a fit ready commons on the bench than a tired 1 on the park to come off plus gms and armstrong can go the full 90 if needed I just really hope forrest doesn't start cause he was terrible again yesterday just runs like a headless chicken has no left foot, composure his decision making and final ball is abysmal

Agree0 Disagree1

If we were lucky to pinch 1 a would like Wakaso on for the last 30 mins, he covered so much ground in that African cup, can tackle and defensively midfield wise was great

Good if we are looking to "batten down the hatches" IMO

Agree0 Disagree0

For the first time in decades the Celtic Manager has many different options especially further up the pitch . I think we have to rely on Deila make the right selection and use his replacements well.

Agree0 Disagree0

Griffiths needs to start as we need to have some threat up front to make their defenders think about the space behind them. I am afraid Guidetti is too slow for this game he struggled to outpace Martin canning on Sunday. I can't see why we shouldn't start with the same team as last week, I like commons but away from home in Europe he can struggle and often doesn't hold the ball up for us. Anyway I think we have a chance as long as we keep things tight early on

Agree0 Disagree0

 
Change Consent