Celtic Banter Archive May 20 2014

 

Use our rumours form to send us celtic transfer rumours.

20 May 2014 19:18:53
Not usually a conspiracy theorist but the revelation on tonight's news that bt sports have been paid to show sevco games is an effing disgrace. even worse that BBC news didn't even mention it. thought I might call the phone in on radio Clyde to register my disgust but funny enough that's finished for the season as well. good timing then. what did celtic know about this?:what about hoops fans who might have subscribed to this channel. as I've said its an absolute disgrace and a total cover up as far as I'm concerned. how can it benefit scottish football to pay broadcasters to show sevco v stenhousemuir.no offence meant to stenny fans.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed007's Note - Remember who went to London with Doncaster for talks about the TV deal. Did having the subsidised TV exposure help Sevco when they were negotiating sponsorship deals? It turns out Scottish football was actually subsidising a TV company to broadcast a match where the TV company were forced to apologise on air over the sectarian and racist songs being sung by Sevco fans in February 2013, how is that for the good of the game? As if Rangers/Sevco hadn't embarrassed the Scottish game enough with their cheating, financial skulduggery and subsequent liquidation.}

Lawell really has to answer to our support now . He has to make a statement explaining what went on in London . Instead of SPL paying ESPN the £250,000 a year to show Sevco they could have cut their losses and shared the money round the clubs who were actually being televised . The halls of Hampden are really rotten to the core . DH

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - Don't hold your breath.}

Is there any way we can join up with other Celtic forums and ask Lawwell for an explanation . Celtic fans should at least deserve an explanation when The Rangers are getting unfair treatment which is to their advantage .

Agree0 Disagree0

Sooner lawell goes the better.

Agree0 Disagree0

Sooner Lawell goes the better?

Lawell helped get Scottish football a tv deal that was very unlikely in coming.

Now I have not seen or heard about this deal given to bt sports to play the sevco "shame game", as I live in OZ.

Sounds a bit to me like we will pay you x amount of cash to get the gullible loyal bears to sign up to your overpriced and under subscribed tv channel if you pay Scottish football an annual fee of x amount. Business dealings worldwide are full of little sweeteners or brown envelopes.

Lawell I think has done a marvellous job at Celtic and before everyone jumps down my throat he doesn't spend enough on the team. I have said before maybe they have no confidence in lennons decisions of who to spend the money on.

We need to be serious and realise although athletico can get players cheap; win la liga and champion league finalists they are playing in one of the best leagues in the world and their restrictions on work permits are far more lenient than ours allowing them to find cheap south American players. As well as Spanish players who are technically better than Scottish players.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - Come on FB, the TV deal was already in place and was then renegotiated. Nowhere else in the football world does a league pay the broadcasters for broadcasting matches, it defeats the whole purpose of having TV deals.
This is from companies that refused to pay for rights to broadcast the play-off matches between Hibs and Hamilton Accies, so the SPFL are allowing them to broadcast them for free.}

My laptop keeps stalling, I disagree with you guys, I think, because of the size of their support, The rangers should be televised, therangers should be included, if you exclude them, itwill turn into paranoia, no one likes us we don't care, we arra peepul, all that kind of thing, at least this way the rest of the british/european viewing public can see/hear what rangers are really about, I never seen the news report about paying bt money, it does'nt sound right, methinks there is some creative reporting going on.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - If Sevco wanted to make sure their games were broadcast I'm sure their 500 million worldwide fans would have rather paid money to their new wee club to watch them broadcast on RancidTV. In their accounts up to 30th June 2013 Sevco received £778,000 from broadcasting rights, so the rest of Scottish football subsidised them getting over 3/4 of a million pounds for playing in what is basically an amateur league, add to that sponsorship would be higher because of TV exposure - and you think that's ok?
If there is some creative reporting going on I'm sure that Peter Lawwell and his SPFL friends will make a statement to put all our minds at rest and make public the 5 Way Agreement to prove the deal wasn't part of it.
This stinks to the heavens and like most things in Scottish football that stink Peter Lawwell is in it up to his neck.}

The only way Lawwell is going to take notice is through complaints made to UEFA or serious protests outside Celtic Park. No point even suggesting withholding ST money cause our support won't do that. The man's played divide and conquer with our support to the point we're all squabbling amongst ourselves while he's laughing all the way to the Bank, it's time we start demanding answers!

Agree0 Disagree0

I think we all know Lawell is driven by money whether for Celtic or his own back pocket.

The only way PL will take any notice of us is if we hit Celtic FC where it hurts ie financially.

It's a shame really that Integrity and honesty has lost out to money.

Time for a huge shake up at our Club, time for honesty and integrity to replace Balance Sheet totals.

You'd wonder what Brother Walfraid makes of it all.

My one big fear is that we're sickened by what we know about, but what about what we don't know.

It's time for all Celtic fans to stand up and be counted.

Agree0 Disagree0

Celts for Change - Sack the Board, Back the Team!

Agree0 Disagree0

@frewbhoy there was ALWAYS going to be a TV deal. Lawell never saved the day, don't know where you got this from.

Agree0 Disagree0

I don't think Brother Walfrid would have any views on this deal. I don't know of any view Brother Walfrid had of the people . Did he ever speak about them?
However if Lawwell has had any role in giving the people a life line, then he would need to explain fully to the Celtic fans .

Agree0 Disagree0

Ed great job as always, a wee question as I have no idea. What are Celtics figs financially pre Lawwell to where we are now. Are we a more prudent club, do we spend more now or pre Lawwell. Difficult to assess I know due to recesson and the dead club but just wondered.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - We obviously spent a lot more pre-Lawwell with deals like the £6m fees for Sutton and Hartson and £5.75 for Lennon but credit where it's due, Lawwell has overseen increasing revenues and a reduction in debt. I'd say that right now CFC are in the best financial position they have been in years.}

Thanks ed your a star, yet the man gets it in the neck no matter what. considerin what happened at the said dead club we are doing no bad lol.

Agree0 Disagree0

20 May 2014 18:57:42
not celtic related just an opinion, it would appear yaya toure is trying to work his ticket, it couldn't be any interest from Spain behind it? great player but still a complete ar£Hole!

Chasaboy

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Agreed I lost respect for him when he played the i'm african so don't get credit i'm due card total ar$e

Agree0 Disagree0

Now not getting treated properly on his birthday is a disgrace . No employer anywhere would forget an employee's birthday .

Agree0 Disagree0

20 May 2014 08:43:25
So, our possible 2nd Q. Round opponents have been confirmed as:

- Malmo (SWE)
- TNS (WAL)
- St Pat's (IRE)
- Cliftonville (NIR)
- KR (ICE)
- Stromsgodset (NOR)
- HB (FAR)

The draw will take place on 23 June, the game's will be played on 15/16 and 22/23 July.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Guarenteed it's going 2 be malmo. Is stormgodset no johansen's old mob?

Agree0 Disagree0

Hopefully it's one of the three Celtic clubs, don't fancy an expensive trip to Scandanavia before going on holiday in August! I think Stromsgodset is a cert but, as you said GB, that's Stefan's old club!

Agree0 Disagree0

20 May 2014 13:55:00
really hoping for a cliftonville game again. was great atmosphere last year for the away leg although there pitch has looked increasingly dodgy near the end of the year

maybe i'm a bit bias anyway with living in belfast

Agree0 Disagree0

Hopefully a wee trip to ireland, St Pats

Agree0 Disagree0

Kieran, do they not play on a 4G pitch?

Agree0 Disagree0

20 May 2014 16:31:41
yea they do but compared to when we played them at the start of the year the pitch recently has been terrible

i go to quite a few games and they had a few at end of season at home and to be honest at the time I wished they were away cause the ball was bouncing like a rugby ball at times

Agree0 Disagree0

Aye either of the Irish clubs, although St Pats are in the middle of their season and would be fitter . A wee run down to Wales before you have border checkpoints (ha! Ha! ) would be ok either .

Agree0 Disagree0

Stromsgodset don't look up to much. Just been watching them there against Stabaek (who I had to win and both score). Just need Cork to win now with Limerick to score also. Come on the rebel army for a nice 1200 quid!

Agree0 Disagree0

Well done JimTim a nice little earner there . One day I'll get that bet up . Do it every couple of days but still no returns . DH

Agree0 Disagree0

Cheers DH. My lass has already gotten wind of it though so it could have been a lot better. Not that I'd recommend gambling but a wee treble with both teams to score has faired me pretty well. Without talking out my arse, I've definitely won more than I've lost. On the note, it's ridiculous how many times Celtic have let me down for decent money.

Agree0 Disagree0

20 May 2014 08:35:13
Re today's Poll of the Day: Would you prefer the club to increase investment into the youth academy rather than spending more on players?

Normally my answer would be yes, however, under current circumstances where there's a clear favouritism enviroment in Celtic's First Team (players walking straight back into the team after injury or suspension / continually getting picked when they're lacking match fitness or form) and a glass ceiling between the Development squad + First Team, it's a no.

When we start to see more youth players given game time, especially when we have the league wrapped up. This season we had 7 games to go when we mathematically secured the title, those games could've been better used to bleed in players who are either ready or potentially ready to make the step up - rather than all these daft egotistical personal targets Lennon set re goals + points!

Believable0 Unbelievable0

HB you have a point but at the same time Celtic were playing with some style and panache and I think Lennon wanted to develop that . He gave a few youngsters a taste of first team football and some did well and some Ok . I wouldn't like the manager to pick young players just to give them a game but rather because the manager thought they deserved it .

Agree0 Disagree0

We spent £8m developing Lennoxtown which opened at the end of 2007, since the season after it opened we’ve churned out the following first team starts from our youth players the past 6 seasons:

2008-09:
Sheridan x16, O’Dea x16, Caddis x7, Conroy x1, McGowan x1

2009-10:
Carey x1, Forrest x2, Caddis x13, McGowan x6,

2010-11:
Towell x1, Toshney x1, Forrest x17

2011-12:
Watt x3, Fraser x1, McGeouch x8, Forrest x43, George x1, F Twadzik x3

2012-13:
Herron x1, Watt x29, Irvine x1, Atajic x1, Chalmers x3, Fraser x1, McGeouch x15, Forrest x29, F Twardzik x2, Slane x1

2013-14:
Herron x1, Watt x3, O’Connell x1, Atajic x3, Fisher x13, McGeouch x3, Forrest x27, Henderson x8, F Twardzik x1

Quite worrying that no one can cement a place, epecially the lads who have been hanging around the squad for a few years now!

Agree0 Disagree0

The academy is really still in its infancy as they would have taken in young players in their first full year that wouldn't have matured fully yet for 1st team football.
Remember academies all over England are struggling to convert good teenagers youth players to solid first team professionals .

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - The majority of clubs in England choose to ignore their own young talent in favour of big money signings but for clubs that want to produce their own players they do, look at Arsenal, Man Utd, Liverpool Everton and Southampton, even Man City are spending millions on their youth program to help them produce their own players. Crewe have one of the best academies in Europe. It's nearly seven years since Lennoxtown opened, players that were 12/13 then would be 19/20 now, the same age as Juventus' Paul Pogba who left Man Utd, Crewe produced Man Utd player Nick Powell, Everton's Ross Barkley and older than Southampton's £30m left-back rated Luke Shaw.
Instead of comparing our academy with England compare it to the Spanish, Dutch, German Belgian or French even the USA has overtook us in producing footballers. England is not the be all and end all of football, it's only Sly's input and advertising that makes you think it's the perfect football league, it's very far from it.}

The problem lies with Scotland as a whole I think, albeit we can only blame ourselves for our own development squads. Anybody catch the Netherlands v Scotland UEFA youth match the other night? Totally bossed, and it was down to playing style, as well as ability. I don't know where to stand, either the homegrown youth we have aren't good enough to make the cut or they're not being given the chance? Bit of both I reckon. Henderson, after his impressive first few games - phased out. CB, crying out for cover - nobody has been given a chance/made the cut. There's tell tale signs all over Lennoxtown hasn't lived up to the hype. Tbh, why would it? What real difference does a new building make? Better surfaces to practice on? Hardly prepares you for half of our oppositions grounds. Then you hear people talk about the psychological differences of training at Lennoxtown and Barrowfield. Quite simply, it's not where you teach kids, it's what you teach them that makes a difference.

Agree0 Disagree0

I am sorry if I gave you, Ed, the impression that I thought highly of the EPL set up and their standard of football. It's just that I read recently that they felt they were not getting good 17/18 old to become good first teamers, just like ourselves . I think alcohol drinking amongst teenage players could be the main reason . I know at Arsenal five or six yrs ago, only one player drunk any at their Christmas party.
It will take another couple of years until we can have reasonable hope of good young twenty (ish) players come through from academie . It would be a bit much to be expecting success in first year. Crewe have developed exciting young players for about half a century under Eddie O' Grady

Agree0 Disagree0

The thing that worries me is the U20's are on 5IAR in the league, the Reserves were on 8IAR when the league ceased, so technically we're sitting on 13IAR. As well as 4IAR in the Scottish Youth Cup. How can the academy be that far ahead compared to the rest of Scotland, but can't make the step up to First Team football domestically?!

Agree0 Disagree0

@ 5 Chris02

I think the Eddie O' Grady you are referring to is in fact called Dario Gradi!

Agree0 Disagree0

Aye you are right . Dario did a massive job for Crewe for an awful long time . Didn't are own Neil Lennon go there from Manchester City

Agree0 Disagree0

 
Change Consent