Celtic Banter Archive March 20 2012

 

Use our rumours form to send us celtic transfer rumours.

20 Mar 2012 23:37:48
Thanks for the reply Ed its sad to see and it really is stupid to see people take things so seariously. It is always worrying to hear that people would do such things over people supporting a different team, at the end of the day we are all just football fans.
JFT96
Smithy {Ed007's Note - Some people, and it is the minority these days, just don't want to move on Smithy. Sectarianism isn't just a footballing problem up here, it is a social one. And no amount of fancy worded BS laws that get rushed through are going to change the mindset of people who have been taught hatred before they even know what a football match actually is.}

Believable3 Unbelievable0

20 Mar 2012 22:45:56
Hi Ed, I see there is a lot of talk about the game at the weekend 'kicking off' due to British flags and the posibilty of Celtic winning the league. Neither of those are valid reasons in my eyes for any trouble. Surely as well Ed there would be huge police and steward presence at the game? Also I don't know if it is the same in Scotland as it is in England but when LFC go to Man Utd our fans stay behind for a long time while home fans are cleared, I understand it might be more difficult when everyone is from the same City its harder however I really can't see it(unless organised beforehand) kicking off if the police get it right.
I have to admit the hatred between Celtic and Rangers fans is worrying. When you compare it to LFC and Everton its like opposites, I am very good mates with a lot of Everton fans and I'm sure you all have family and friends who support the other so I don't understand why everyone seems so happy to 'hate" the other and cause trouble.
Just my opinion mate, it just seems strange from an 'outsiders' view that friends and families could do such disgusting things to eachover.
JFT96
Smithy {Ed007's Note - In and around the ground the segregation is the same as at OT for high risk matches Smithy. All police leave is cancelled and there is a strong police presence from early doors around the stadium and in the surrounding areas. The majority of trouble is after the match when people go back to their own towns and areas. It is sad that in this day and age people still take it so serious that it can lead to violence and even death for others. As usual with any volatile situation, alcohol and peer pressure only adds to the problems.}

Believable3 Unbelievable0

Whilst not disputing the ferocity of the Celtic v Rangers rivalry for one minute, I would like it to be put in perspective for those outsiders wondering what is going on here. There is a lot of negative press coverage of the game, mainly from the Scottish press. This is regurgiated by the UK media which I fear largely leads to the perception you have of it. The truth is, much is overblown and written to sell papers. It is true there are genuine problems associated with the fixture and more of that in a minute. What I do want to point out though is that large crowds of 50-60k have been attending these games for years without any trouble. A riot - over 30 years ago - at a cup final was the notable ecetion to the rule but since then OF games have largely passed without incident and there are upwards of 4 of these each year. In truth, it has a good record in terms of crowd behaviour when compared to other derby's, particularly on the continent. To give you an example of why press coverage is misleading, last years cup replay was labelled a shame game. Why? I'm still waiting on an answer to that. 3 Rangers players got sent off (2 for second bookables) and the managers had a spat (nothing more, no punches thrown). Unedifying yes, but not uncommon in world football. No riots, no flares, no dodgy singing(I can recall), no vandalism, no pitch brawl, but to the Scottish media it was a shame game. And why not. It's a good story right? And Sky, well they love that. Viewing figures were up! Then there's the talk of sectarianism and trouble around the city. The real trouble with the fixture is not the football itself or even sectarianism but the drinking culture associated with it. It is common for people to drink all day when this game is on - it has become that sort of event, or that sort of excuse. People take the next day off, meet early to get hammered and spend all day in pubs That leads to the sort of statisitics you'll have read about. Unfortunately the analysis of these is pretty lazy. It's worth pointing out that some of these can be also found at public holidays and are even higher at Christmas than they are for an OF game. In fact, they can be found anywhere in the UK (and particularly Scotland) where people feel they have an excuse to drink all dayin large numbers. unbelievably, this even includes the last royal wedding!I also read some research from a university academic down south recently suggesting that similar trends can be found at some English derbies but that they don't receive the same press scrutiny. I've no idea if that's true but worth considering. The other difference with our derby and others down south is that we not only share the city, we are the only show in town as far as our league is concerned, and I genuinely dont mean disrespect to others when I say that. Such narrow competition does however lead to an obsession with one another whereas a wider perspective would dilute this. Ed007 is correct when he highlights the historical sectarian issue in Scottish society and he's also right to point out it is a societal rather than football issue, particularly where Celtic are concerned as despite some ill founded comments to the contrary, we've always been open to and supported by people of all creeds and none. It is also the case that sectarianism is on the wane in Scotland and has been for decades and, just as you point out about Merseyside, it is commonplace for Celtic and Rangers supporters to be friends. Some even watch the game together! That's not for me though! With any luck, Sunday will pass peacefully (and Celtic will win!). If it does it will be in spite our unhelpful local media. Regardless, anyone who does involve theselves in any trouble won't be doing so in the name of football. They also won't be representative of the opinion or behaviour of the vast majority of decent supporters from both sides. And they will almost certainly be drunk! Paul {Ed007's Note - Great post Paul. Take a bow that man.}

Agree1 Disagree0

Thanks ed. Wanted to get it off my chest lol {Ed007's Note - No problem Paul. It's a pleasure to read posts like that rather than trawling through a pile of childish one liners.}

Agree0 Disagree0

I have to agree with everything you have said. i am a gers fan but my group of friends is 50/50 and we now watch the game at someones house with a few beers instead of going to different ends of the park or different pubs. unfortunately there is some morons on both sides who see this as an opportunity to get smashed and cause trouble. as you said we are the only show in town so the spotlight is right on us all the time. hopefully this will pass with no serious trouble and the morons stay away.

if you are out and about stay safe

DJ

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Mar 2012 22:29:15
Mr Alex Salmond
Office of the First Minister
St. Andrew's House
Regent Road
Edinburgh EH1 3DG Email: FirstMinister@scotland.gsi.gov.uk
20 March 2012

Dear First Minister

Re: Rangers FC

First of all let me send my compliments and greetings to you and I wish you every success in your campaign for a Referendum of the Scottish people.

You will no doubt have read and be well aware of the situation with Rangers FC. I sincerely hope and remain optimistic that the Emir of Qatar and his family will take an express interest in acquiring what I deem to be “the best buy in European football”.

You will no doubt also be aware of my previous involvement in Dundee Football Club which, although some of the media misrepresented, I am pleased to say that there is now a truly good possibility of the Club being restored to its premiere position. The Club, like many others, suffered the pitfalls of Administration, which may well have been avoided.

This whole matter regarding football has inspired me to consider the political position of football generally and the relationship between sport and politics. Technically speaking, I agree with you, when you once stated that there should be no connection. However, since most sporting entities are in fact commercial enterprises, I am honoured to draw your attention to the Historic Environment (Amendment) (Scotland) Act 2011.

May I specifically draw your attention to s. 12, which is headed “Development and understanding of matters of historic, etc. interest: Grants and loans”. I have the honour of citing the Act below.

12 Development and understanding of matters of historic, etc. interest: grants and loans After section 45 of the 1979 Act insert—
Studio Legale Internazionale

“45ADevelopment and understanding of matters of historic, etc. interest: grants and loans (1)The Scottish Ministers may make grants or loans for the purpose of defraying in whole or in part any expenditure incurred, or to be incurred— (a)in or in connection with; (b)with a view to the promotion of, the development or understanding of matters of historic, architectural, traditional, artistic or archaeological interest. (2)A grant or loan under this section may be made subject to such conditions (including conditions as to repayment) as the Scottish Ministers consider appropriate. (3)Without prejudice to any powers of the Scottish Ministers under any enactment (including this Act), the total amount of grants and loans which may be made under this section must not exceed £100,000 in any one year period.”.

May I specifically refer you to s. 45A(1)(b), which deals with the promotion and development or understanding of matters that are of historic, architectural, traditional, artistic or archaeological interest.

Section 45A(2) allows the Scottish Ministers (plural) the powers of granting loans or “grants” as they deem appropriate.

In my respectful submission, there is no greater need today than for this legislation to be adopted for a grant and/or loan to Rangers Football Club and any other Club within Scottish football on the basis that it is compliant with s. 45A(1)(b).

Namely, unarguable that Rangers Football Club and other Clubs need the development and that they are matters indeed of historic, traditional, artistic and possibly even architectural nature.

It may interest you to know that the legislation, for example, in Italy, permits local councils awarding grants/loans to Football Clubs within their administrative communities. This has safeguarded many of the smaller clubs and avoided bankruptcies, thus stabilising the league.

Since the government has, for example, intervened in the RBS to the tune of over £44 billion, and it is shameful that this year the bank has reported over a £3 billion loss, there is no reason why the Historic Environment (Amendment) (Scotland) Act 2011 should not be used to award applicant Football Clubs financial assistance from the government since most of the clubs in Scotland are invariably 100 years, or more, old.

It is without a doubt that, for example, Rangers Football Club, carries an importance within the community. The Act deals with the promotion and development of such entities.

I am of course aware that prima facie s. 45A(3) seems to limit any government intervention to £100,000 which may be of little use to Rangers FC, but may be a saving grace for other clubs. However, the said section is caveated with the words “without prejudice to any powers of the Scottish Ministers under any enactment”.

The Scottish Ministers in my view have the powers to intervene and can, for example, even today, in the case of Rangers FC grant sufficient funding for the Club to pay taxes that are due, or any other government levies.
Of course, all legislation has to be adopted and used in a responsible manner.

If RBS can benefit to the tune of more than £44 billion and to date it has produced a loss of £3 billion, and certainly has no historic interest, retained no traditional values in banking, and its development or understanding can only but be described by many companies that have been bankrupted as a result of its activities, why, then, can Rangers Football Club not be assisted now by legislation that was enacted to assist these kind of unfortunate circumstances?

I would, thus, invite you to consider at the very least this possibility and, if necessary, form a select committee on an urgent basis to review whether this option should be available to the football community.

I extend my compliments and greetings as usual.

Yours sincerely

Giovanni Di Stefano
STUDIO LEGALE INTERNAZIONALE

Believable2 Unbelievable3

20 Mar 2012 21:51:01
5 massive obstacles Rangers have to overcome to come out of administration:

1. Win the Big Tax Case.
2. Have a purchaser willing to pay Ticketus £40m over 3 years.
3. Creditors to accept a CVA.
4. Craig Whyte to agree to sell the club
5. Effectively deal with Whyte's floating charge to the tune of £18.

Any one of these is a big ask. All five? Can't see anything other than liquidation.

Believable6 Unbelievable1

Mark Hateley should take out that daft diamond ear stud and sell it off for the Fighting Fund. He looks like Tim Westwood's grandad. Lol.
The Real KB {Ed007's Note - You should see some of his clobber mate. It is miles out. I would rather wear the 1996 LFC 'Spice Boys' number. Hateley look like he got dressed in the dark. Him and Scott Brown must use the same shopper, Brown's golfing gear is horrendous ;-)

Agree3 Disagree0

Seen that helmet Hateley walking through the Italian centre with a pair of leather trousers and cowboy boots , what a donk......DH

Agree6 Disagree0

20 Mar 2012 19:21:06
UEFA has confirmed that the Estadio da Luz in Lisbon will host the 2014 Champions League final.

Benfica's home ground, which is commonly translated as the Stadium of Light, opened in 2003 on the site of the original Estadio da Luz with a capacity of 65,647 and staged the final of Euro 2004, where Greece triumphed over tournament hosts Portugal.

The city last hosted a European Cup final in 1967, when Celtic beat Inter Milan at the National Stadium.

This season's final is May 19 at Bayern Munich's Allianz Arena while the 2013 final returns to Wembley Stadium.

(Hope Lisbon is prepared for another influx of Tims.lol)

Jungle Bhoy.

Believable4 Unbelievable1

Champions League Final is the night of the Scottish Cup Final.

Agree1 Disagree0

20 Mar 2012 19:16:17
awrite limpy hows you?
pp fae the p
fleet ya bass {Ed007's Note - Not bad wee man, how's you?}

Believable1 Unbelievable0

20 Mar 2012 18:29:17
Remember this... :-)

Scarves, banners, jerseys, green and white hoops raised in triumph."

www.youtube.com/watch?v=V_Aysau0zE4

Mrs E

Believable4 Unbelievable0

I'm in that video Mrs E, my dad took me and i have supported them ever since!

Happy days

DazzaBhoy

Agree1 Disagree0

That is one of my favourite commentary memories of all time Mrs E, was at the game too, grounded by my Dad afterwar5ds for running on the pitch lol

ChrisBhoy

Agree1 Disagree0

20 Mar 2012 15:54:56
timalloy posted at 19:43 last nght i was nghtshift so didn't read til i got up today , it was about flags at ibrokes on sunday , i suggested something but never got much response because it was such an old post not many of you probably read it, i was wondering what you think . if they are going to wave 43000 union flags on sunday , im sure someone could get 7 or thousand replica league flags made up and i think it would be a certainty they would sell the lot outside the park . so a nice wee profit there for someone in the know about such things . billybhoy

Believable3 Unbelievable0

20 Mar 2012 14:42:22
ARROGANCE by Neil Lennon (todays E Times)

“I would say our cup final defeat was a bad result for the rest of the teams in Scotland.”

“I didn’t want to go 4-4-2 on Sunday just because of the way Kilmarnock would have set up. We might have been too open. But we made the change bringing on Ki and putting Victor Wanyama back into defence, and that was the trigger for complete domination.” ......Final score 0-1 Killie Haw Haw RTID

Believable1 Unbelievable11

Exactly what part of what he said sounded like arrogance? If anything he was giving credit to Kilmarnock for the way they play and he's absolutely right, when Ki came on we did dominate the play, we just couldnt find a way to goal.

You sir, are an idiot.

TerribleBeauty

Agree7 Disagree1

Teams like Barca 'dominate' and win 5-1! If this is the Celtic version of domination then bring it on. Lawwell used the word dominate recently too but I dont think he had in mind a Cup Final defeat to Killie.

Pride comes before a fall and although you might beat us at Ibrox (we are on our knees after all) you will soon be on the slide again as you are bottlers!
GTM.....RTID

Agree0 Disagree6

You might be on your knees , but the arrogance of Rangers fans knows no bounds , instead of accepting that your club has run up tax debts , which have to be paid , you lot want to blame everyone else , given the possibility that Rangers might yet be forced to go cap in hand to the SPL and the other 11 clubs to get your league place back , all you lot want to do is talk about boycotting away games , while giving it big licks with your sectarian bile in a "F*ck You All" show of defiance , sell your Union Jacks if you like , but a bit of humility would not go amiss , and in answer to your initial point , i agree Neil Lennon should have had more humility on Sunday , the better team won , end off , i just hope that on Sunday , no matter the result , that both sets of fans behave themselves , banter is all and well , but lets keep it in check , the eyes of the world are on Glasgow .

Agree4 Disagree1

Why was this guy allowed to call me an idiot and then you chop out part of my reply? Geniune question Ed {Ed007's Note - I am not long back online so I have no idea why another Ed cut it, they obviously felt it was inappropriate.}

Agree0 Disagree1

20 Mar 2012 14:31:11
Bozek just scored for us in a bounce game against Dunfermline. Ally Mc Coist was right he would make a dream part with jellyfish in attack. Poor Ally failed again ;) bigirishmac.

Believable5 Unbelievable1

20 Mar 2012 13:07:57
Right.League cup gone,Semi of the National to go and ipox.I have been saying for weeks we have not been playing well,even including swinecastle,and should have been freshening things up.For me,Hooper or Stokes have been poor for 5-6 weeks,forrest has been patchy since the league cup v hibs and as a team we dont seem to be as creative as we were.Only when Ki is in the team do we move the ball quickly and open up a pitch.I hope lenny throws a surprise in on sunday as i feel we might be getting a bit predictable to play against. Sammi up front solo with ibrahim playing a no 10 role in support?............green jhedi

Believable4 Unbelievable0

Green Jhedi , ive felt similar for a few weeks now, what happened to the 4-3-3 we played in europe, i feel we would rip some teams to shreds with a setup like that! But Lenny reverted to 4 bloody 4-2 and play became stale and predictable although up until Killie we had been taking the chances we created. I can understand the thinking if it aint broke dont fix it however a bit of diversity to our tactics would i feel open up teams a little bit more. I feel the way we played the 4-3-3 it forces our guys to move and pick up the space and be more fluid in attack and makes them realise when they lose the ball they have to get right in the faces of the opponent right up the pitch. That has gone too, I think a mixture of rangers in admin and feeling that a job is already done has brought a bit of complacency into the team, i see him sticking with pretty much the same shape and lineup with a couple of changes probably play sammi and hooper up top for example. So more of the same me thinks.

Evinguu

Agree2 Disagree0

@Evinguu;Think you might be right about the front two for sunday but i have lost trust in hooper for the moment.Not doubting the natural goalscorer hooper is, but he has been off the boil in recent weeks both in touch and scoring.Our best display this season was Udinese away,why not just play it always? get a system that suits your players and instill it through the club? I feel it is a great way to shape up with so many permutations depending on how a game is playing out.It also leaves your attacking players to play up the pitch.At the moment Hooper and Stokes are too far apart,we need to hunt in packs and really force ourselves onto teams.I would love us to really pressure rangers from minute one as an early goal might rattle them all over the pitch............green jhedi

Agree3 Disagree0

20 Mar 2012 13:01:23
i see they're all gettig excited about sheikhhamadbin kalifa al thani the mega rich guy ,i think people like the afore mentioned gentleman only go into football for fame and glory and nothing to do with love of the club. so if you were mr. kalifa why would you invest in rangers ,forget about the mess they're in , angers will never win the champions league even if they had no debt , we simply can't attract the caliber of player to scotland that are capable of beating the barcelonas of this world. so if mr. kalifa seriously wants into british football why would he not just buy everton , newcastle ,aston vila. all teams with huge supports and massive amounts of tv money . for someone like him to buy rangers just doesnt make any sense,, billybhoy {Ed001's Note - unless it was a political move?}

Believable0 Unbelievable1

Are you insinuating Scottish Govt intervention ed ?
You scratch our back, we'll scratch yours ?
The Real KB {Ed001's Note - or simply to ease a massive business deal, ie he is trying to make a long term deal with a Rangers fan. I am just saying, not everything is about the obvious profit, sometimes there is a hidden profit from a deal. But your point is certainly not out of the question, especially if they would do the same to Glasgow that has been done to Manchester by ADUG. The regeneration has been incredible, they are bringing jobs and prosperity to an area that was previously one of the worst in the country. I am sure that any plans to do the same for Glasgow would be encouraged by the Govt.}

Agree0 Disagree0

Alex Salmond is as oily as an Abroath kipper. But he's a cute fella. He has eyes on the long term independant future of Scotland, no doubt about that. As you say, getting in a potential investor, offering sweet terms for energy development etc etc. When politicians start (a) getting interested in football and (b) sticking their oar in, it is a sad case. i just have a feeling that sneaky get Salmond will see Rangers right.
The Real KB

Agree3 Disagree0

Ed, i didn't know that about manchester, and that being the case i suppose it's not out of the question , but that raises an even better question , why would he not approach mr. desmond to see if he wants out , then he would get a ''clean '' team , billybhoy {Ed001's Note - and how much would it cost him to do that? Plus, if it is a political move or one aimed at gaining some other advantage, buying Celtic is not going to be of any use.}

Agree0 Disagree1

20 Mar 2012 12:50:48
I read speculation over the weekend that The Celtic were being considered for application to English League 1 or Championship? Is this a result of the question of the other 10 SPL clubs panning a meeting without Celtic or Rangers or is it a purely independant venture in view of future financial investment and growth?
Also, do fellow Hoops think we would be welcomed in England if it ever went to a vote etc?
I picked up on a few comments about being rid of biased media and other adverse influences if we move, but I have sensed a love affair between Rangers and SLY Sports and doubt it would be much different in English tabloids IMO.
It's probably unlikely to happen, but what do you think Ed007 and other regulars?

Jungle Jim {Ed001's Note - it was a Celtic initiative, the majority of English teams are against the idea, and I mean a major majority. They have very little to gain and it could possibly be the difference between promotion or relegation having Celtic or Rangers there. So they could lose out badly, it is understandable they will be against it as the money is negligible.}

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Still dont understand why the old firm
were excluded from this meeting. Celtic and Rangers are the only 2 who stimulate
interest in Scottish football from tv companies

Agree3 Disagree1

You two want to go to England - we want you to go to England the quicker the better!

Jambo

Agree4 Disagree2

20 Mar 2012 12:38:51
Gordon Smith said that he noticed
some panic when they were knocked outy
out of Europe. He kept this close to
his chest and continued to take his
salary. Rangers fans have been
DUPED by many so called Rangers
men.

Believable7 Unbelievable0

20 Mar 2012 10:06:32
Morning ed. How ru mate? I think everyone needs to calm down a bit after the defeat to kilmarnock. It was Kilmarnocks day. The saves Cammy Bell was making were top drawer. I am not going to say anything about the players because those young lads have turn the season right round on it's head. When we where 15 points behind in the league those guys could of said fxck it there's always next year but they didn't. The lads lost the game after a run of more than 20 games on defeated. Like give them a break. I think Neil should freshen things up abit. Looking forward to Sunday already. The bhoys should be mad to get going. Bigirishmac {Ed007's Note - I'm good thanks BIM. I hope you are well too.}

Believable1 Unbelievable0

At the end of the day Killie were the better team. Cammy Bell had a blinder. We could have played another 90 min and still not scored. No point in getting wound up about the pen. Cammy Bell would probably saved it the way he was playing. Any other day of the week those 5/6 chances that Celtic had we would have put them away. Respect to Killie they seemed to want it more than us.

Ian(54 and subtracting)

Agree4 Disagree0

How many saves did forster hav to make in the game again?

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Mar 2012 09:34:02
Good morning ED007, I caught part of the Five live show last night, debacle just does not describe, love in? Anyway Jackson made a comment that he and another reporter have spoken with HMRC and that they are willing to do a "pence in the pound deal" if Whyte is no longer there. ED007 I know you are well up on all this and will tell us, including Rangers fans the truth. But my understanding is that HMRC has a privacy policy and cannot speak about ongoing cases and certainly not to a reporter. How can these people get away with telling blatant lies and also BBC allowing them to air their lies on a national programme? Timalloy {Ed007's Note - The show was pure propaganda Tim, as soon as I heard the line up on the panel it was obvious what it was going to be like. I couldn't listen to any more after about half an hour.}

Believable1 Unbelievable0

Gday Timalloy, said something similar last night! love in is certainly the most apt description.

Forgot to pick Ed007 up on the point about the distaste for all things BBC not being very long lived. I see his as part of the general we will follow follow. It was mr Whyte who started the war on the BBC and the Rangers fans followed on. Now whyte is gone the BBC are still slightly castiated for daring to give thier club bad press and actually dig a little deeper than they would have preferred but now no one is telling them to boycott the BBC so they dont!

Also hearing there should be a rather interesting piece on Chanel 4 this evening, hopefully true as they usually do decent reporting.

Evinguu {Ed007's Note - Alex Thomson from C4 News has been looking into the Rangers situation for a while. He has uncovered quite a lot that isn't known to the public yet, it should be interesting. David Murray has refused numerous requests from him for an interview.}

Agree1 Disagree0

Hello Evinguu, not spoke in a while, hope you are well. ED007 what time on Channel 4 please?
Guys did you catch SDM on Sly?
One sentence jumped out at me...
"we are contesting this vehemently, as per our advisors, we believe we are not AS guilty, as HMRC believe"
"AS GUILTY" is that him admitting there is a DEGREE of guilt there?
The only good thing is the more SDM and CO put things on the record, in their own voice, the more will come back to bite their bums.... Timalloy {Ed007's Note - It is on sometime during the 7 o' clock news Tim.}

Agree0 Disagree0

And if the guy thomsons findings favour rangers youl be saying thats a rangers love in aswell eh , tedbear

Agree0 Disagree4

Im good timalloy, hope you are too! Still disappointed with the team on sunday but hey you cant win em all and we were due to get beat at somepoint.


oh tedbear that reads to me as a worried man. But i imagine there will be plenty of Rangers fans shouting the old timmy propeganda line if it isnt positive. If the truth comes out and Rangers are squeaky clean then fair doo's.its unlikley but is still a possibility even i have to admit. I doubt this piece is primarily focussed on Rangers per se but more on the SFA and possible malpractice and corruption, which all supporters from any team have thought for a very long time, albeit generally in some form of them showing bias to Rangers. But i have no proof myself other than what is dug up in blogs and by journalists and a little of my own research back in the day. so will have to wait and see.

All i want is the truth, no pandering to peoples best wishes or portraying a doomsday scenario just the truth, it would seem though that as more of this truth comes out the more certain people bury their heads and look to pass on the blaim and give the all is rosey line.

Evinguu

Agree1 Disagree0

I meant to catch this last night, but missed it. It was with a live audience wasn't it ed ?
I suppose in one way the presenters can only reflect what the audience tell them. But usually with the BBC, at least with their live political debates, they will have representatives of all sides of the arguments. I assume this was not the case last night then ?
The Real KB {Ed007's Note - Andy Goram was on the panel RKB, that kind of sums it up really.}

Agree1 Disagree0

I really don't know why the BBC do that for sports articles. They wouldn't dream of doing a one-sided programme on politics, so why do they shy away from it in sport ?
It could have been a potentially very interesting couple of hours but it seems like they loaded the audience.
I like the Beeb for their news / politics as much as any agency but at times their sport stuff is poor. Is it because they're scared to pi55 the respective clubs off, and fear being frozen out by Sky or influential figures like SAF.
In fact, thinking about it, that seems to be the point at which they have began to tread lightly - when SAF stopped giving them interviews.
The Real KB {Ed007's Note - The BBC don't want any controversy over sport it seems RKB, as you say, I think they got a 'fright' over the AF affair and are even more mollycoddling than their usual sycophantic low standards.}

Agree0 Disagree0

Ed and The Real KB. Its nothing do do with that, Its all in the interest of unbiased and fair reporting you see! And how much fairer can you get than pretty much sitting on the fence untill something so big comes along that they cannot ignore it and report it from an unbiased (in their eyes) stanpoint. lol

I appreciate the BBC myself just be thankful we dont have NBC or CNN or woe betide Fox as our main news institution..... oh bugger we pretty much do were ran by the murdochs... sugar... maybe need to think before i post lol

Evinguu {Ed007's Note - Fox is dreadful Evinguu, and as you say, anything that has Murdoch's mucky paws on it is tainted.}

Agree0 Disagree0

You're right Evinguu mate.
The BBC may have it's faults but I give Sky a complete swerve. I wonder what would happen if Al Jazeera got the next tv rights for EPL / SPL ?
The Real KB

Agree0 Disagree0

The Real KB i think we would get a better all round product if it was North Korean state TV!!

Evinguu

Agree1 Disagree0

Lol Evinguu.
But the ed would be f***ed for his wee dolly birds doing the sports news eh ?
The Real KB {Ed007's Note - I hope you aren't referring to Hayley as a dolly bird??}

Agree0 Disagree0

I am.
Anyway, if Al Jazeera gets the next tv deal she'll be doing the sports news in a hijab.
Lol.
Give me Gabby Logan anyday.
The Real KB {Ed007's Note - I never thought you would have been into scrawny women mate. Someone should tell her the 'heroin chic' look is out dated now.}

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Mar 2012 08:54:52
Just a question to all Celtic fans. Rangers took dogs abuse a couple of years back when we brilliantly won the 'Diddy Cup' (as you call it when it suits you) against St Mirren with only 9 men! May I add Danny Wilson was disgracefully sent off when he wasnt the last man.. but hey ho we got on with it as we are simply the best. Do you agree that that magnificent achievement puts into perspective your teams failure this weekend? (Notice how I called your team by its proper name) get ready for Rankers etc. 

Believable0 Unbelievable6

You took dogs abuse? Why was that?
And that game has got to do with Sundays game what exactly? The straw clutching from the Rangers page is becoming incredible. You did win it with 9 men. Well done, and just think, in a few weeks thats all you will have.....memories.

Joeshmo1888

Agree6 Disagree1

Still hurtin I see. My point is we are a club that never uses excuses when under pressure. We get on with it and above is an example of triumphing over adversity. Celtic however are never defeated only cheated. Months of benefitting from refs decisions and Celtic are quiet. Soon as there is a contentious decision goes against you lot complaints fly in. Can you not see the difference? No? Thought not! RTID

Agree0 Disagree3

Triumphing over adversity lmao What an arrogant thing to say when you have not paid taxes and yet still bleat on about being a great club.Open your eyes and see how shameful your clubs actions have been over the years while parading soldiers at Ipox to gain some free publicity your disgrace of a club hasn't paid a coin towards their wages, care or equipment. Are the Shame even capable of being embarrassed over anything FFS?

Agree3 Disagree0

Triumphing over adversity lmao What an arrogant thing to say when you have not paid taxes and yet still bleat on about being a great club.Open your eyes and see how shameful your clubs actions have been over the years while parading soldiers at Ipox to gain some free publicity your disgrace of a club hasn't paid a coin towards their wages, care or equipment. Are the Shame even capable of being embarrassed over anything FFS?

Typical response! Ipox? Our 5 star stadium is called Ibrox! As I pointed out in my opening point you lot always end up with the usual Rankers etc and what do you do... call us the Shame. Are you 5 years old perhaps?
For your information we have had dodgy people inside our club and they have blackened our name. Im ashamed we havent paid tax. Thats down to an individual called C Whyte. Is that ok for you? Keep the subject to what goes on on the pitch. Your team bottles it in the big games...non? GTM

Agree0 Disagree0

You say we bottled it on Sunday but do the words Malmo,Maribor,Falkirk + Dundee Utd mean anything to you?

Jungle Bhoy.

Agree1 Disagree0

Thing is we know we are pash. You lot think youre something special. Humbled on Sunday and it was deserved as you were needing to be taking down a peg or two. GTM- RTID

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Mar 2012 08:10:21
not being a follower of either the old firm i have to say the contrast between their managers macoist with everything falling down around his club yet still behaves with a degree of dignity neil lennon on the other hand could not bring himself to congratulate killie on sunday and his antics about the penalty says it all and he wonders why he is not well liked

Believable5 Unbelievable11

Great post Well done!

Agree4 Disagree9

Agree - Lennon is totally lacking in class and dignity

Agree4 Disagree11

Your no a fan of the Old firm. Sure Gerry.
Lets wait till we hear what whispering Ally said at Parkhead before we talk about class and dignity.

Joeshmo1888

Agree7 Disagree2

We know why you lot don't like Neil Lennon and it's because of sectarian and bigoted reasons and the fact he stands up for himself and his club. It is one thing to ACT as if you have dignity but another to actually be dignified,just because he wears walters old suit and brown brogues on match days and stands on the edge of the pitch holding the lapels of the suit like a fat winston churchill doesn't mean he's a dignified man. He's a media darling who knows how to use the media machine to his own benefit,everything he does and says is for the camera's just like a politician. There's no dignity in tax avoidance,there's no dignity in taking the proceeds from an arranged charity game away from a cancer charity and there is no dignity in cheating the whole of Scottish football for decades. Dignity Shmignity.

Agree10 Disagree2

Sorry Ed forgot to leave name for above reply.

RabBhoy

Agree2 Disagree1

I do agree that the public face of McCoist is the 'Cheeky Chappie' well oiled and polished as a celebrity on QOS charming the bloomers off Sue Barker.
He is a media darling while NL has never had the press on board even though there is a list of atrocious events that he has been victim of most of which is based on religious hatred. He is portrayed as pantomime villain in the 'Closed Shop' Scottish media and Rangers fans would rather criticise Lennon than see what a clown their darling Alistair really is.

JJ

Agree10 Disagree2

Fans up in places like inverness where its mainly familys who go to their games are they bigots to , they give the guy stick to , lennons an in your face type of manager and he gets stick for it , darren jackson was another player who got stick in every ground he played in but a never heard. anyone playin the bigotry card on his part , tedbear

Agree3 Disagree7

Anything is falling down around ally, how many death threats has he received.
No dignity in making sly comments about kicking people when there down.

Agree4 Disagree2

 
Change Consent