Celtic Banter Archive April 01 2011

 

Use our rumours form to send us celtic transfer rumours.

01 Apr 2011 22:57:44
Celtic have been in the knock out stages more times than rangers? I though Celtic have been there once same as the gers. And r u honesty going to harp on about winning that trophy again? Same old sh*te. Well then rangers are the most successful team in the world with 114 trophies. Yes The most successful team ever! !

C-bear85

Believable2 Unbelievable1

01 Apr 2011 21:54:19
Re: The Tiger - Mr Whyte and Mr Ellis couldn't afford to bid for Celtic let alone buy Celtic , we have 3 BILLIONAIRES as shareholders , so stop spouting pish , £5m investment in your team won't make any difference , you have 5 loan players (Diouf , Bartley , Weiss , Healy and Foster) in your meagre squad , of which you'll be lucky to even keep hold of Foster if Craig Brown tries to cash in , add to that Bougherra (who's working his ticket) , McGregor , Davis (saleable assets) and Weir (41 years old and past it) who may raise a further £8/ 10m , leaves you needing to replace at least 9 players to have the same sized squad for next season , without adding to it , so its not all singing all dancing yet , then theres the taxman to sort out , lets wait and see if Whyte and Ellis are the real deal before you start getting lemon .

Believable4 Unbelievable1

01 Apr 2011 21:04:52
To C-Bear,
Celtic are the only scottish team to win the european cup, we have been to the champs league last 16 more times than you (with harder groups may I add), we try to play entertaining football instea of 5 at the back constantly and finally WE ARE TOP OF THE LEAGUE. So why don't we laugh at that ya monkey!

Believable6 Unbelievable1

01 Apr 2011 19:41:38
Let's all laugh at celtic, a ginger bitter manager who despite having millons to spend cannot buy 1 decent center half and a goalkeeper. A team that has made a joke of Scottish football in Europe for seasons. Whilst skint rangers are left with the burden of carrying the flag for Scotland and trying to get more teams into Europe. The same Celtic team that made a joke of our officials because they were unable to accept defeat graciously, but instead blame some far fetched conspiracy theories.
Celtic are a joke. They lack class. Stamp their feet when things go against them. So let's all laugh at celtic.

C-bear85

Believable4 Unbelievable5

01 Apr 2011 18:49:37
Lets all laugh at Rangers, The taxman is coming!

Believable6 Unbelievable3

01 Apr 2011 17:41:16
Fair point and I hope the takeover does go through because when when we wiin the league u can't use being skint as an excuse ;-)

Kevbhoy

Believable2 Unbelievable1

01 Apr 2011 17:02:46
Lennon back on 9th april after sfa(joke) have admitted being a bunch of numties. . .hopefully we can put this to bed soon and get on and try and win the league/ cup! ! !

In neil we have a great manager

Where the hell is freddie??


bristolcelt

Believable3 Unbelievable1

01 Apr 2011 15:47:32
Wot u said below is correct yeah but this aint what u said originally?

"In my opinion this makes it more exciting and also means the rangers takeover won't go too far to deciding the title next year."

but the takeover WILL have a huge bearing on next year cos it aint certain it will go thro so obv must be a big factor. What i was saying is that if the takeover doesn't go thro Rangers will be pretty much in the position celtic were in during the 9 in a row time. Hence why the it prob hinges on the takeover.

GTID

Believable0 Unbelievable0

01 Apr 2011 15:29:25
We're really not going to get anywhere with this are we? If the rangers takeover falls through then obviously it would be a disaster for you lot. BUT! assuming that the takeover does go through, (which I was assuming when I made my initial post), both teams will be on more of an even keel than they have for the past couple of years, hence: money not the major factor. Important factor? Of course, but it's how they use their money that is going to be more important, not who spends the most. Back in 9 in a row the gap between celtic and rangers financially was enormous, so that was more of a deciding factor back then but not so much anymore. Surely you can see where I'm coming from here.

Kevbhoy

Believable1 Unbelievable0

01 Apr 2011 14:51:52
GTID = Moron. Obviously if both teams are going for the same player money willl prevail. But I meant players that are only linked with one of them. Both teams have had big money signings who have flopped, so I am right in saying that money won't be the deciding factor. And the 9 in a row thing. . Rangers did buy 9 in a row because they had a seemingly bottomless pit of money whereas celtic were being run into the ground. But these days both teams have debt and are being run far more responsibly meaning that they are more even in terms of transfer budgets this time around.

Hopefully that covers is but no doubt you'll try to twist my words regarding this comment too so talk to you soon :-)

RE: you say money won't determine what happens yet u say gers DID BUY 9 in a row so surely being vastly financially stronger CAN (not will) determine the league (especially in scotland). Then you also said that if a player has a choice he will choose the bigger wages further proving my point. But if Whyte doesn't take over then its cos of outstanding debts he can't cover which means we could be well and truly fuked meaning we will have a repeat of the 9 in row era. Besides im pretty sure the number of players signed for say over 2/ 3 million and are paid in the upper end bracket of the club have done well more often than they have flopped.

so in the long run all u did was prove me right, cheers

GTID

Believable0 Unbelievable0

01 Apr 2011 14:32:20
GTID = Moron. Obviously if both teams are going for the same player money willl prevail. But I meant players that are only linked with one of them. Both teams have had big money signings who have flopped, so I am right in saying that money won't be the deciding factor. And the 9 in a row thing. . Rangers did buy 9 in a row because they had a seemingly bottomless pit of money whereas celtic were being run into the ground. But these days both teams have debt and are being run far more responsibly meaning that they are more even in terms of transfer budgets this time around.

Hopefully that covers is but no doubt you'll try to twist my words regarding this comment too so talk to you soon :-)

Kevbhoy

Believable1 Unbelievable0

01 Apr 2011 14:16:22
The amount of money Celtic and Rangers pay for players is not important. It's down to the scouting and talent spotting. For example, Fortune 4m - DUD, Izzaguire 700k - potential player of the year. In my opinion this makes it more exciting and also means the rangers takeover won't go too far to deciding the title next year.

Kevbhoy

Re: Silly Silly post! money not important . . ok we will take the Commons scenario rangers and celtic are both offered a player both want him the team that is financially better off can offer more wages. . which team is he more likely to go to?

Another way to look at it is this scenario . . . gers don't get bought over and need to sell their best players and can't replace them for next season, u honestly tellin me that u don't think it would affect the way the title goes much?!

granted scouting and talent spotting (poaching) does help but to say money won't go to far in deciding next season is just retarted! I eman you change ur stance every day it seems !

So if money doesn't go to far in deciding things u admitting it wasnt gers spending power that won us 9 in a row?! hmmmm lets see how u squirm outta that one

GTID

Believable0 Unbelievable0

01 Apr 2011 13:45:37
Also Ledley is worth more than £3m

*******************************************************************


Wit u puffing mate, Ah would'nt pay 3 quid for Ledley he's gash! U will be luck to get 3 mil for him!

c-bear85

Believable1 Unbelievable3

01 Apr 2011 12:59:08
01 Apr 2011 11:32:07
CELTIC NEWS!

i've heard from a very reliable source that no less than five first team players will be leaving this summer

cha du ri - 2 million - bourssia dortmund
izaguirre - 5/ 6 million - liverpool
maloney - 1/ 2 million - reading
ledley - 3 million - everton
samaras - panathaniakos - under a mill

this is from a very reliable source, he said we have a lot of targets in mind including darron gibson from man utd

he thinks we will end up with gibson, st ledger, mcfadden, but none coming in are guarenteed just the ones out
YNWA

Why would we give Sammi a new 3 year deal then sell him for less than £1m? we could have done that in Jan!
Also Ledley is worth more than £3m

Believable2 Unbelievable2

01 Apr 2011 10:44:40
The amount of money Celtic and Rangers pay for players is not important. It's down to the scouting and talent spotting. For example, Fortune 4m - DUD, Izzaguire 700k - potential player of the year. In my opinion this makes it more exciting and also means the rangers takeover won't go too far to deciding the title next year.

Kevbhoy

Believable3 Unbelievable0

01 Apr 2011 10:54:29
Ed please post this. .

When Celtic where handing back the keys and fergus McCann saved us he promised-

-Team full of internationals
-Worldclass stadium
-Solid foundations for future success
-To sell his shares to the supporters

he delivered and more.

What are they being promised?

5 Mil a season or 1 1/ 2 Laffertys lol. They need to treble that ammount next season as they will only have 13 players lol

Their stadium is falling apart, no brand wants to be associated with Scotland's shame

can't stop laughing at how Whyte is their saviour lol

The futures bright, the futures whyte.

Hope so. . .:0)

Believable4 Unbelievable2

 
Change Consent