Celtic Banter Archive September 17 2014

 

Use our rumours form to send us celtic transfer rumours.

17 Sep 2014 19:36:00
Does anyone miss the good old days when Scottish Teams were full of Scots And English teams the same etc? I Know that wasn't always the case but certainly most if not all teams were like this.
Now interestingly enough here is a Celtic team if that was the rules as we would a bought the best.
1 Gordon/Marshall
2 Souttar
3A.Robertson
4 Mcarthur
5Reynolds
6OConnell
7Snodgrass
8Brown
9Fletcher
10McCarthy
11Commons
Subs from May, Armstrong, Mulgrew, Pawlett, GMS.
Anya.
Now I know I could a picked anyone but I tried to base it on players we could a bought easily or were linked with.I estimate this team would a cost us about 10m(1st eleven) if bought at the right time.So my question is 2 fold. Wud this team beat our current 1 and what team would you have?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

I don't see how that team would cost u 10 million u must be steamin

Agree0 Disagree0

For a start there's no way in hell that team is costing anything less than 20 million for the fact of the premier league players regardless of their skill the inflated prices of the premier league is just the way it is. Also O'Connell is Irish and McCarthy plays for Ireland.

Agree0 Disagree0

Gordon/Marshall free
Souttar 500k
A.Robertson 2m
Mcarthur 700k from Accies.
Reynolds Free
OConnellFree
Snodgrass 750k from Lvi
Brown 2.2M
Fletcher 2.5m
McCarthy 1m from accies.
Commons 300k.
We wudnt have bought the players as they are now we would a bought them before they moved south as we would be buyin up the best talent available.

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Sep 2014 18:55:09
Big Archie Mac, if we vote Yes, Celtic will never get in the EPL, is he for real.

We all know Celtic will never get into the EPL, wonder if Scottish Football could possibly revive itself when Independence is granted?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Agreed kev. We all know we are never going to get into the premiership. Why even say it now? Scaremongering for folk that would put football ahead of the nation. Waste of newspaper space.

Agree0 Disagree0

Maybe Sly will have to give more money to Scottish football if the answer is YES?

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Sep 2014 17:49:43
Celtic has announced it will reopen the Green Brigade section at the club's stadium.

The Parkhead side temporarily banned 128 fans and broke up the section of hardcore fans at Celtic Park in December last year.

The club announced the action following fan disruption during an away match at Motherwell, in which seats were ripped out and smoke bombs were thrown onto the playing surface.

A total of 250 season ticket holders located in Section 111, where the Green Brigade are located at Celtic Park, were moved elsewhere in the stadium.

In addition, 128 fans were banned pending investigation by the club.

On Wednesday, the club officially announced it would be reopening the section for its forthcoming home match against Motherwell on Sunday.

It said the decision to reopen the section followed "positive" talks with members of the Green Brigade.

A club statement read: "Celtic can confirm that we plan to re-open Section 111 in the North East lower corner of the stadium to season ticket holders, beginning with the forthcoming match against Motherwell to be played this Sunday, September 21.

"The reopening follows a period of positive discussions with former season ticket holders within the section, during which it has been agreed that the safety of spectators must always be of paramount importance and that the reputation of the club and its supporters must be protected at all times.

"As is the case with all fans attending Celtic Park, compliance with ground regulations, competition rules and the law must be observed.

"Celtic considers this move to represent significant progress in fan engagement and acknowledge the role played by supporters from the section who have agreed to work with the club to provide positive backing for the team in a safe environment, with further agreements in place that any breaches will result in a review of section usage.

"The club was instrumental in establishing this section for supporters and we look forward to working together to ensure its long-term success in providing strong positive backing for Celtic manager Ronny Deila and the team."

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Really glad about this. Criticised them last year and I hope they can keep out of trouble. But I have to admit the atmospheres not been the same.

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Sep 2014 16:34:38
I think sometimes as supporters it's easy to forget about how our club stands out and what it actually stands for. The majority of us have been decrying PL for lack of investment etc. over the summer, myself very much included, but I just read an article about Celtic having in kids from Chernobyl and I feel quite proud. We can complain about transfers, sometimes rightfully so, but we should never lose track of our clubs origins and take huge pride in the amount of amazing work Celtic do all over the world and how many people less fortunate than ourselves benefit from this. The past couple of months have been frustrating as a fan but there are more important things.
Having said that I will be ranting on here if we play sh*te tomorrow lol.
Hail Hail

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Theres a poll on celtic quick news about what it is that makes us celtic supporters,

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Sep 2014 15:51:15
Heard on celtic page that the green brigade are back at paradise good news if true!

Believable0 Unbelievable0

17 Sep 2014 13:34:49
The thing about deila I don't get is, he said that he doesn't tolerate players making the same mistakes again and again. Now big efe is making mistakes week in and week out but still gets played. Why?. Also deila is making the same mistakes week in and week out. So what does he not learn.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Because there's hee haw else! Matthews is out, Lustig out?, god knows where Fisher is and I'm not sure I'd wanna see Mulgrew at CB anymore unless it was in a back 5.

Agree0 Disagree0

What mistakes is Deila making week in week out? He doesn't have any other option but to play efe just now, I'm sure he'd like to give him an extended break.

Agree0 Disagree0

Celtic fans seem to like having a scrape-goat and Ambrose is playing is landed with that role now .

Agree0 Disagree0

See that other Norwegian "magical manager" Ole Gunner Solsjkar getting the boot!

Maybe being a "highly respected" manager in Norway doesn't count for much after all?!

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Sep 2014 18:01:03
Granted ambrose hasn't covered himself in much glory so far this season and it gets highlighted constantly yet what about mulgrew? his performance over in warsaw in particular was an absolute shambles yet no 1 else apart from a few seem to be screaming for him to be sold or benched especially with him being an atrocious footballer and a shocking excuse for a captain. I actually feel sorry for ambrose he makes the slightest mistake and folk want him punted yet charlie swans about the park as if he's a left footed xavi and gets away with it constantly. No 1 was moaning about efe when we got out the group stage 2 seasons ago. The guy is obviously lacking a bit of confidence and form it doesn't mean we should get rid of him fs he should be backed. I know people will disagree and no doubt come back with a response but it's just an opinion. Vote YES

Agree0 Disagree0

Yourman, he's the worst defender in the side, not a scapegoat more just a reason if you ask me. Was only in the side under NL because of his pace, he's got absolutely nothing else. Quite why we still haven't signed another, PERMANENT CB is beyond me. He's not the only one below par though, granted. Things should be a lot better now with Brown back and the new signings, even better when Lustig, Forrest and Matthews return. However, there's room for improvement everywhere and it should be met with a bit more ambition still.

Agree0 Disagree0

Ambrose is an International player with bags of experience and it is his decision making and not his ability that is rank.
He takes risks all the time and can be very over confident and complacent.
Unfortunately his attitude and refusal to learn from mistakes makes him liable.

Agree0 Disagree0

I agree one of Ambros's best strengths is his pace, pace is very useful for a centre defender and many times last season Ambrose rescued himself and other defenders by his pace .
Ambrose is very ineffective as an attacking right back but at the moment needs must .

Agree0 Disagree0

Reminds me of Big Bobo. a defender who could do a job but when he decided to start playing football.bombscare

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Sep 2014 12:28:20
Did anyone catch Frankie Boyle last night on the YES/NO show?

Got to hold my hands up and say that is first I have seen him but given he took the piss out the other half will have to see more

Last night a PMSL at him

ATVB

Believable0 Unbelievable0

17 Sep 2014 13:39:17
Kevin bridges dvd even funnier when slags the zombies over the city about the face painter. Saying u could imagine the boardroom running about kidding on they are tigers and stuff. Pmsl.

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Sep 2014 11:32:13
ED,

and to the rest of the contributors

having looked at a great many fans forums, CFC is once again head and shoulders ahead when it comes to discussing (some would argue intelligently) the BIG issues and it is a credit to this page, ED, and ourselves; self praise is no praise they say but it showed me that "our fans" have a lot of credible things to say about most things in the INDY debate and that can only be a positive thing.

As ED says, this is not about the team you support, or your view on marches, or your religion (if you have one), or what your parents political allegiance so happens to be. This is about something altogether different and I have found this source right here CFC fans forum page, every bit as informative as other credible sources of information

It may have been off topic, but so what .

It may have bored some to tears, but others read and read some more and posted and posted some more

and what did we learn when all was said and done

5 things

(1) the wonders of iodine
(2) ED is off to Dubai
(3) Ed has no house, no car and no credit card
(4) Rayman and DN30 didn't go toe to toe over the INDY debate
(5) Taking on ED and Sopotcelt simultaneously is asking for trouble over any debate, but you live and learn .

Hail Hail x

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Aye paradise and it is fact YOU that can type 1000 words a minute not Ed! lol

I come on here daily as a release from my routine and spent (sadly) a lot of my day on forums / blogs looking for "nuggets" on information

On here I have found Ed not only to be informative but to 001 very obliging when it comes I feel among my "own" on here and as a said it is a release

If he is off to Dubai thankfully he will(as far as I can make out) still be OUR Ed as 003 001 are based there too! he is taking wee pat to be "00 2 sugar n milk" I hope if you are off there Ed am sure it will to seek a better quality of life (is that not what everyone seeks/wants or even we are voting for) ATVB JB7

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Sep 2014 11:26:33
ED, I hope you don't mind posting this but I thought it was a really well balanced "economic" article with the PROS and the CONS

last post on the matter but I found it quite helpful and maybe some of our co-contributors will find it useful too.

_________________________________________

Here is the bad news if you haven't made up your mind whether to vote for Scotland to become independent - economic analysis cannot give you the answer.

That is partly because this dismal science is not capable of giving wholly (and sometimes even partly) accurate forecasts about the future prosperity of nations.

Look at the case of a comparably sized small country, Ireland. A decade ago many economists (and others) saw it as a RIP-ROARING success, that had become considerably richer on a per-head basis than the UK.

Then three years ago it looked like a total BASKET CASE, as its property sector and banks imploded.

Today it can be seen as a model of how a determined small country can RECONSTRUCT its economy in adversity, in stark contrast to the inertia in a bigger country such as Italy.

According to IMF calculations, Ireland is still generating A BIT MORE INCOME PER CAPITA than the UK. But, my goodness! It has experienced misery in the past few years, in the form of savage wage cuts and high unemployment.

So does the experience of Ireland prove the case for or against Scottish independence?

Well it shows the risks of being small and placing too many bets on one or two economic sectors. But it also shows the benefits of a STRONG NATIONAL IDENTITY, which empowers a government to respond fast and boldly to prevailing economic conditions.

Ireland is still CONSIDERABLY RICHER than it was two decades ago. But the ride since then has been, well, a bit hairy.

So if, as a voter in the Scottish referendum, you think Ireland is at all analogous to Scotland, what you would ponder is whether you are attracted by the flexibility and room for manoeuvre that seems to be associated with being a small nation, or whether you prefer the ability to pool and share risks - the shelter in a storm - that comes from being part of a bigger country.

In Scotland, oil and pensions seem to illustrate this choice or trade-off.

If, as seems likely, an independent Scotland was endowed with 90% of the UK's oil-producing assets, it would have the ability to deploy the associated tax revenues to nurture a more diverse private sector and to tailor public services to Scottish preferences.

But there are substantial risks here. What if the oil price continues to weaken and if production declines as rapidly as many analysts fear it will? If Scotland failed to invest the oil dowry fast enough and astutely enough, it could find itself a poorer and weaker nation than would pertain if still part of the UK.

In oil, to labour the point, there are both opportunities from independence, and risks.

The same is true of pensions. With more retired people relative to tax-paying workers in Scotland than in the rest of the UK, the cost of pensions in Scotland is a bit higher than in the UK as a whole. So remaining part of the UK would help make pensions more affordable for Scotland, by spreading the costs over a larger population.

But if the government in Scotland were to encourage immigration, that burden on Scotland could fall. And anyway, Scots may want to pay a bit more for a state pension that captures preferences that are different from those in the rest of the UK - which may be a delayed rise in the pension age, as mooted by the Scottish government.

Again there is a trade-off between safety and opportunity.

There is one other point about Ireland that is worth considering.

Ireland's economic growth as a so-called "celtic tiger" pre-dated its membership of the euro. But that growth became dangerously supercharged when its cost of borrowing plunged after the launch of the euro.

Now there is zero chance in the short term of money becoming perilously cheap in Scotland.

The cost of borrowing for Scotland as a new nation will rise, a bit, for a while. This is inevitable, while uncertainties about what currency it will use are addressed, and as its government acquires a track record as a budget maker and borrower.

And it is not just the direct cost of finance that would probably rise. As social scientist Perri 6 has pointed out, anyone across the border engaging in a long term contract for the supply of goods and services in Scotland is likely to hike the price, to cover the currency-devaluation risk. And that would squeeze the public sector, including the NHS, as much as the private sector.

This increase in the cost of capital could spur Scotland to become a more competitive and less wasteful economy. To use a hideous analogy, this would cast an independent Scotland as an efficient leveraged buyout.

Or it could lead to an economic slowdown and a loss of income that would take many years to claw back.

All that said, what Ireland demonstrates is that a small English-speaking independent country, in the European time zone, with a highly educated population, a culture of hard work and a strong sense of patriotism is likely to prosper in the long term.

What Ireland cannot prove one way or another is whether the immediate economic tariff or price for that putative long term prosperity is worth paying.

ED, the article was about the "economics" and not necessarily about

health provision
schools
pensions
infrastructure
social justice
income inequality
housing
environment

But it does show that where there is a WILL and a DRIVE, setting the turbulence to one side, there are PEAKS and TROUGHS but critically, the sky didn't fall in over Ireland and their gas lamps didn't go out!

Believable0 Unbelievable0

The problem with Ireland was that Ireland got Ind . for basically the poor areas of the island . The industrialised North East remains part of Britain . Scotland's oil, whisky, wind and wave farms should be enough to equip Scotland a lot better for an Independent state than most newly Ind
States from where- ever.

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Sep 2014 09:27:01
I see the usual nonsense in papers about Salsburg "struggling" "loss of Form" "disappointing CL qualifier (sound familiar?) etc.
I guarantee we will see a fully focused Austrian team on thursday and I hope no Celtic fans are swallowing the rubbish printed in the papers.
Delia's Celtic are not exactly filling this tim with confidence on the euro front, hope I am proved wrong but with Ambrose seemingly unmovable from Delia's team we are up against it.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

17 Sep 2014 14:27:02
Timalloy they are suffering both form loss and loss of players. The question is will we be focussed enough to take advantage of it. I think we will. Someones due a beating. Maybe its the unashamed adverising campaign they call a football team.

Agree0 Disagree0

 
Change Consent