Celtic Banter Archive October 10 2018

 

Use our rumours form to send us celtic transfer rumours.

10 Oct 2018 18:16:00
Is Celtic being given the lions share of ticket allocation for the Murrayfield Semi final?

With more season ticket holders than Hearts it's important these valuable people contributing to the Scottish game every week get priority over one timers showing from hearts.

Believable3 Unbelievable0

10 Oct 2018 19:51:00
So let me ask you a hypothetical question.

If Celtic made the Europa league final and played a team like Barcelona or Real you would be happy for Celtic to receive less tickets than them?

Agree0 Disagree0

10 Oct 2018 19:52:53
Would argue if you can't get a ticket through Celtic you're the glory Hunter.

Always amazes me the Celtic fans stamping their feet. When cup semi/ finals come about.

Don't know any diehards that won't get a ticket.

Agree0 Disagree0

10 Oct 2018 20:01:01
It's always been a gripe with me that fans who travel week in and week out to watch their team and who put money into the game have to miss their reward of a semi final or final ticket to make way for fans who in a lot of cases haven't been to a match that season.

A neutral venue should be to do with the playing side of things, it shouldn't mean that there should be a 50/50 split of thr tickets.
Aberdeen continually moan about their allocation for these games yet when they played their league cup final at Celtic park they were quite happy to have 40,000 fans there against 7,000 or so Inverness fans.
I wonder if Aberdeen were insisting on a 50/ 50 split for that match. I somehow doubt it.

Agree0 Disagree1

10 Oct 2018 20:13:36
Gerry caly were asked how many they would require and gave the answer of around 7000. Can't see how that applies here.

Agree0 Disagree0

10 Oct 2018 21:43:53
Kev the difference with a European final against Barcelona or Real Madrid is that both teams would have more fans than there would be tickets available. In that situation I don't think anyone would argue against a 50/ 50 split. Neither team would have once a year merchants and glory hunters denying fans from the other club a ticket.

In Scotland though teams that a lot of the time average about 10-15,000 per match demand double that for a semi or final.
If people can't be bothered to go to matches during the normal season then I don't think it's fair that they are given priority over fans who have spent a lot of money supporting their team in all weathers.
These occasions should be a reward for genuine fans that have put money into the game.

Agree1 Disagree0

10 Oct 2018 23:02:12
It should be 50/50, is the only fair, neutral way, if one side, or both sides, hasn't sold there allocation by a week before the game, the remaining tickets should go on open sale, with a bit of thought, the policing of it could Shirley be worked out.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Oct 2018 07:43:29
Gerry if neither team would have people that don't attend games how do you explain how many Celtic fans that turned up in Seville?
At least 20 thousand more turned up than our stadium holds.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Oct 2018 09:25:30
30,000 for Hearts,30,000 for us and 7,000 corporate tickets. The corporate tickets allocation is way to high for fatcats and hangers on from the business world. God knows where there's 30,000 Hearts fans! (Probably the person element of their fanbase) .

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Oct 2018 09:31:35
Now sevco v Aberdeen is a 60/40 split. If its a Celtic v Aberdeen cup final it will become a 50/50 split due to sporting integrity. Sfa happy to fill seats with sevco supporters yet last years semi v hibs they would rather there was 10,000 empty seats instead of giving them to Celtic fans, who have by far the most season ticket holders in the land.

Agree2 Disagree0

11 Oct 2018 09:34:39
So because I can’t make most of the games but happen to be ok to get a ticket for the semi final or final I shouldn't get one? So because there’s fans that can make every game it’s their right to get it? That’s what’s wrong with fans too many feel entitled.

Agree2 Disagree0

11 Oct 2018 10:19:11
Or what about fans who don't live in Scotland and can't get to every game. If I lived in Scotland I would be at every celtic game.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Oct 2018 12:31:35
A would give it 60/ 40 spit to the tic personally.

Agree3 Disagree0

11 Oct 2018 15:09:28
Toprig

So fans that go every week have to miss out because someone who didn't can make the Cemi-final?

Agree1 Disagree1

11 Oct 2018 15:11:58
Cory67

It always suprises me that people out with travelling distance can make it for Cemi-final/ finals. Never seem to make Kilmarnock away. Funny that 🤔🤔🤔🤔.

Agree1 Disagree1

11 Oct 2018 15:53:24
That will probably happen in long run Kenny but all teams getting to a final or semi final should have the right to take as many fans as they can.
Whether it be Clyde Arbroath Aberdeen Celtic or The Rangers.

Teams should be asked how much they can sell, then told they must sell section by section and if you haven't sold out by a certain day the other team gets offered them.

If the spfl and sfa put this in writing and made it clear this was how it was going to be done from now on it would stop a lot of moaning and greeting.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Oct 2018 15:54:18
If you meet the criteria for a ticket from Celtic fair enough, but there are some supporters who only go to sevco, semis and cup finals and i don't know how they manage to get tickets for these matches. It must be from the sponsors who get way too many tickets for hampden and its the fans who go to the majority of the matches who miss out.

Agree2 Disagree0

11 Oct 2018 18:01:32
Hearts could sell easily 30,000 for Murray field but as some say our home attendance is usually 20,000. I would give u lot the other 37,000 but the corrupt SFA mob give 7,000 tickets to corporate - joke.

Agree2 Disagree0

12 Oct 2018 00:59:28
Kenny, I think we probably should get more but I’d also be agreeable to a 50/ 50 split if the same rules were applied to the other semi-final. How the SFA can justify their double standards is beyond me.

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Oct 2018 10:25:19
Sfa are in the same lodge so new co can do no wrong.

Agree0 Disagree0

10 Oct 2018 17:34:52
I'm concerned at the changing of established policy and rules by both the SFA and SPFL to assist Sevco TRFC.

The recent example is the non allocation of Hampden briefs on a 50/ 50 % basis to Aberdeen and TRFC. Holding thousands of Aberdeen briefs for the cup semi and giving them to TRFC.

Celtic has partook in years of semis and finals at Hampden and told they could not get extra seats as it was a 50/ 50 sporting integrity split (resulting in thousands of empty unsold seats) . The SFA/ SPFL clearly delighted in empty seats rather than Celtic fans in them.

Has Hearts had the allocation at Murrayfield reduced by thousands to hand to 60,000 Celtic fans? If not, why not?

Believable7 Unbelievable0

10 Oct 2018 18:17:35
Tbh it's about time glory hunters were stopped from denying fans who go week in week out a ticket👍.

Agree2 Disagree0

10 Oct 2018 19:11:46
Won’t happen corporate barstewrds will still get their allocation.

Agree0 Disagree0

10 Oct 2018 19:16:12
I don't see what's wrong with giving each club 50/ 50. Both have worked to get to a semi final.
But what should happen is you must sell section by section and if you can't sell out the rest should be offered to the other team.

Agree2 Disagree0

10 Oct 2018 19:29:27
Didn't you know that whenever there has been a Celtic v Rangers semi or final that the that mob got slightly more than us every time and it was never 50/ 50 split due to the stadium design or that was the excuse they gave anyway.

Agree1 Disagree0

10 Oct 2018 19:45:06
The issue is policy change on the hoof by a select closed doors few at Hampden instead of putting the issue to the 42 SPFL clubs for democratic determination.

Curious it’s always done when required for TRFC benefit and never done if it would assist Celtic.

On the upside, all those extra ticket sales to TRFC fans will go into Aberdeen coffers. I think the rule is into their bank account within three days of the game 😃.

Agree0 Disagree0

10 Oct 2018 20:11:40
Aberdeen have been given around 21000 tickets.
Originally told they had around 16000 and had to sell them by a certain date to get more.
I think that is a very sensible way to do it.

Problem was with all the carry on and hold up over venues, it gave them no time to sell the 16000 properly so they demanded the rest.
Which they were quite entitled to do.

A lot of people on this page demand equality in Scottish football but seems like they only want it to work in our favour.

Agree1 Disagree0

10 Oct 2018 21:57:53
Kev, TRFC we’re allocated an initial 26,000 and Aberdeen had to argue to get more than 16,000. The SPFL plan was to give TRFC 29,500. Last year in Oct 2017 Celtic and Aberdeen got a 50/ 50 split argued on sporting integrity and fairness by the SPFL.

It was known Celtic could bring an extra 40,000 to the game and Aberdeen would never sell their allocation. But the SPFL were having none of it.

There were 10,000 empty seats and four times that in Celtic season ticket holders and others who wanted to go.

Hibs were the same.

So it’s all change in policy at short notice to assist TRFC.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Oct 2018 00:29:29
Kev, I agree it’s a sensible way to do it if the same rules apply to both semi finals but It’s clearly unfair to give Sevco the lions share of the tickets at Hampden but insist on a 50/50 split of the tickets at Murrayfield. That’s one of the most blatant abuses of power I can remember since Jim Farry delayed Jorge Caddete’s registration.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Oct 2018 07:53:38
I don't think the sfa will allow empty seats with this one, unless hearts pay for them, it must have cost a fortune to rent murrayfield. It holds about 67,000. Say they take 17,000 for corporate ( no idea if that's accurate) that leaves 50,000 to share, if they can sell 25,000 fair enough but if they don't they will either have to buy them or they come to us surely.

Agree0 Disagree0

10 Oct 2018 13:20:26
Don't get me wrong lads, I think he's fantastic but one criticism I have of Kieran tierney is the fact he seems to be so one footed. Always looking for a pass or cut in on his left, sometimes puts him In awkward situations (that he normally gets out of) . But just a thought, he would be even more brilliant if he worked on his weaker foot. Having said this, he's an unbelievable talent. Just something to maybe work on.

Believable1 Unbelievable0

10 Oct 2018 17:52:54
Roberto Carlos, Gareth bale quickly come to mind. You don't need two good feet to be world class.

Agree1 Disagree0

10 Oct 2018 18:20:36
He's a LB not a striker he doesn't need to be two footed, I think his first touch let's him down sometimes and has to reset himself to put a cross in.

Agree0 Disagree0

10 Oct 2018 21:44:52
All players should be 2 footed it’s a disgrace they are not! Should spend an extra 15 mins a day after training working on their weaknesses.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Oct 2018 07:25:28
pre-season training is usually about fitness.
After that, imo, training should be partially about keeping fit and more about working on tactics and weaker personal points.
Weak right/ left foot - practice strengthening it.
Penalties - ALL players practice them.
Corners/ Free Kicks - ALL players again (how many times have we seen one of our best striker taking frrekicks and corners when HE should be at the receiving, not the supply end?

Agree0 Disagree0

10 Oct 2018 12:37:30
It seems our "impartial" press are going all guns blazing on wee Griffiths for pulling out of the national squad.
Did you also know that a Mr K Lafferty withdrew from the Northern Ireland squad also on Sunday, but there is ZERO on this.
At least Griffiths gave his reasons, big Laughatme, like all sevconians before him, just simply withdrew.

Believable4 Unbelievable0

{Ed007's Note - LG should have said the Green Brigade had contacted him and asked him not to play against Israel to show support to the Palestinian people - that would have went down well.}

10 Oct 2018 13:27:16
Why would the Scottish media report on a Northern Irish player? I personally only care about Scotland and who or who may not be in the squad. I'm sure the Irish press will have headlines on laffs and not LG, honestly man!

Agree2 Disagree0

10 Oct 2018 13:29:30
There has always been anti-Celtic biased and mischief makers among the hun-loving media, but I honestly think it has got ten times worse since their new club TRIFC was formed in 2012; especially since BRs arrival has elevated Celtic to a level they can never equal.
They remain deluded in denial and the whole thing is deflective.
Having went through a cart load of managers and a conveyor belt of journeymen and misfit: they lie 6th in the SPL and have failed to beat Celtic in twelve attempts, but let's not talk about that.

Agree7 Disagree0

10 Oct 2018 22:18:01
Agree wholeheartedly OAB but I can’t ever remember it being as bad as it is this year. They have taken it to new levels since Slippy G arrived. It’s got me wondering if it’s a last roll of the dice for King and Sevco?

Agree0 Disagree0

10 Oct 2018 10:57:05
Ed do you think goalkeeper is a position that BR will look to address in the summer? I'm asking because if DDV is contracted until then, we will need to either promote one of the lads to 3rd choice keeper or bring in a new number one and push CG and SB down the pecking order.

Believable1 Unbelievable0

{Ed007's Note - I've been hoping Rodgers would address the GK situation since he came, we're never going to progress as a team in Europe with Gordon in goal.}

10 Oct 2018 14:29:16
Ben Woodburn and Predrag Rajkovic are supposed to be two goal keepers we're considering.

Agree0 Disagree0

10 Oct 2018 15:01:25
Gordon is a very good shot stopper. Kicking is dreadful and never comes off his line which is costing us goals.

Don't think Bain is the answer.

Agree1 Disagree0

10 Oct 2018 17:58:44
It really surprises me that Rodgers hasn’t tried to bring a new keeper in, he wants to play out from the back yet Gordon’s distribution is awful. How many times against Salzburg did he seem under little pressure yet go long?

Don’t know how good Bain is but I’ve noticed he’s much better with starting attacks and passing under pressure.

Agree0 Disagree0

10 Oct 2018 18:16:08
Ben Woodburn is a striker lol.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Oct 2018 12:33:56
So his distribution should be class.

Agree1 Disagree0

09 Oct 2018 23:54:16
Ed, I have read a few comments about Dorus de Vries. Some say he is no longer with us and I know there was talk of him leaving but to the best of my knowledge he's still here. Can you confirm either way? HH.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed007's Note - De Vries is contracted to Celtic until 2019, www.celticfc.net/team

 
Change Consent